manvshumanity
manVsHumanity
manvshumanity

I’m an atheist, however, I thinks it’s unfair to blame religion on this. People just used religion as another tool to condone racism. I think human history has shown that people will use whatever means necessary to explain their forced hatred of other people to make them feel better about themselves. I would say this

Is that youtube, or the companies that are always trying to sue them over that sort of stuff? Would a competitor be any different once they started being sued by record companies over the same bullshit? Probably not. I think you are blaming the wrong people, it’s the record companies trying to squeeze any sort of

My wife’s a self employed lawyer. All your questions apply to any business startup, not unique to streamers. You set up your own company, show the tax returns for past years. Streamers have to get paid from google some way, so set up your business, have google pay to said business and track payments. For her, was much

They depend on a third company, which they aren’t paying. Their poor business strategy is dependent on said company.

“Women don’t plan to be raped. Parents don’t plan for their children to be victims of incest,” Texas State Rep. Chris Turner, a Democrat, said about the law.

Chase Utley

Holy shit, that’s a low bar. I figured people who could not score above 1000 did not go to college. Except athletes.

What metric? You asked to see something, I provided it. By no means did I give an opinion on anything, you just presumed my position because the information I provided refuted you. It does not mean my position supports the gun being drawn. It just means when making points, do not make hardline statements because then

This was a lead story on cnn.com this past Friday. And they use this video in a lot of training.

Video game

Yeah, I’m with you there. That’s a weird list of benefits to make. There are definitely benefits to being white. But the aforementioned list is for like 1% of white people.

I agree with your description of the ACA (which I support), but your premise for hating on the closing of article is wrong. Strictly speaking, the final comment is making of the of the anchor’s statement, because that is a description of all insurance. Healthy people subsidize sick people with health insurance. That’s

noo..! you double posted.

To add to your argument, I looked this up last week, to prove the sky rocketing rates theory wrong. The three years before ACA, the rates were raising an average of about 7% per year. The year ACA was enacted, the rates went up like 11-13%. So, the midterm had this huge jump, and then they lost. The years after, the

Well, yeah, that is a problem. But a vast majority of the democratic party is pro-choice, pro gay marriage and all. Just look at the state differences. And democrats in charge will not take away a woman’s right to choose, pushed through the ACA, and had a president come out pro gay marriage.

Winning is all that matters, though. Moral victories can lead to losing ground on women’s rights, LGBT rights, immigration, etc.

....