+1

Yup. People are more than the sum of their parts, which is what you’re reducing them to by claiming that there is any segment of population that ought to be shielded from war, other than all of them. If they’re good enough to serve, and they want to serve, then there is no reason to exclude them. Point blank. Your…

Sorry that you’re afraid and ashamed by the parts that the rest of us seem to have no issue with. And that you have no valid counterargument, so you have to resort to namecalling instead of trying to make your case. You, your antiquated worldview, and your small mind have my sympathy but no respect.

That is a nonsensical comparison. War and its horrors are inherently awful no matter what; you cannot make the claim that 51% of the population ought to be magically exempt from that on the basis of what exists between their legs. You can personally believe that somebody shouldn’t be involved, which, fine, but your…

Except if you read to the fucking end of the article, the guy in charge of integration plainly states that standards aren’t going to change. You’re pissing and moaning over nothing.

I don’t think you actually know anything about women that you haven’t heard in a Larry the Cable Guy skit.

It’s less unconscionable to put the fathers and potential fathers of the next generation in the meat grinder of war?

How is it unconscionable?

The argument about women qualifying at the lowest level for men is bunk on the face of it. We don’t disqualify those men for barely making it in - that’s why that standard exists. They qualify. Would you advocate against those men, as well?

It’s funny, being conservative like you looks exactly like that, too.

The “trophy just for showing up” trope is so, so overused, and if anything, is an indictment of the baby boomers who implemented it, not the kids who grew up with it. Guaran-fucking-tee you every kid who got one of those knew what was up, and it didn’t make them soft; nor are drone operators, who arguably undergo more…

ENIAC was preceded by ABC, which is why ENIAC lost its patent case. Thanks for stopping by!

Also, you reading comprehension-challenged asshat, the esteemed commenter lives in California, not Iowa.

Kinda weird how voting to recall judges isn’t the same as voting to ban gay marriage, but, uh, sure.

The fucking computer was invented at Iowa State, dipshit. Fuck off forever.

You know, for a guy named Lleyton, he sure didn’t seem to mind the assist from Jack Sock.

+1

Oh come on, like you’ve never immediately discarded a jack sock seconds after finishing

+1

[citation needed]