Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner! It’s just the other half of tvtropes.com. The half people don’t really talk about these days.

Here is the so called “outburst”. I won’t point out the obvious contradictions to what is being stated in this article (like I have with others on here), as you seem capable of rational thought.

Short version where Badger first speaks:

The panel wasn’t the Mary Sue’s panel, so that is your first lie. It was called Women Into Gaming, The Mary Sue merely wrote an article on the expo.
They didn’t yell and holler, they were invited to talk and were recieved enthusiastically, so that is your second lie.

It’s a hate group the the exact same extent that Feminism is a hate group. If you tar GG with trolls brush, you have to tar Feminism with Dworkins’ brush too.
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors…

Nope. It updated March 4th.

Wrong. There was no shouting or interrupting. They were enthusiastically invited to talk. Here is the audio proof:

Know your meme!

The panel was called “Women Into Comics” and had nothing to do with The Mary Sue. That you can’t even get that basic fact correct really harms the legitimacy of the more detailed things you say.

This is the level of disruption:
1. The panel hypothetically asked a question of MRA’s.
2. Alison (of Honey Badgers) said she was an actual MRA, and could answer the question in the concrete if they liked.
3. The panel enthusiastically agreed and asked her to speak.
4. They spoke and the panel agreed on many points.

They didn’t talk over them. They were invited to talk:

You don’t want to imply she has a booth? WTF does that even mean? Close your mouth, you’re drooling.

Well, _I_ want one. Just because _you_ don’t want one too, they should be kicked out?

When they were saying it: At the Q+A audience participation section of a panel on female comic authors.
Why they were saying it: Because she was a female comic author and was hypothetically asked a question which she was then asked to respond to in the concrete by an enthusiastic panel.

Or male feminists!

Why not? There are male feminists.

This isn’t derailment, this is invitation, followed by polite debate:

Exactly, it’s funny how the poster has “stand against censorship” and and the expo has been using a mission statement of equality for everyone, yet one ends up censoring the other. It’s clear to me who the good guys are, and who are the authoritarians.

Are you arguing it is impossible to be both a feminist and unethical? You seem to be implying that.

Where did they “admit” they were there to be disruptive? Source please.

OK, here are some links to the actual event that triggered them being asked to leave.
Here is the short version so you don’t have to wade through the whole thing: