mancubusjam
mancubusjam
mancubusjam

Oh yeah, I heard that the groundhog day stuff was about to start and I already wasn't enjoying it, so I decided to give up there. I really appreciate your description of where it goes from there though, it actually makes me enjoy what I DID play more in retrospect, knowing who Ringabel was and so on, so thanks for

Yes, if someone does an objective scientific study, and something is shown to have a stong correlation, then it "becomes more of a thing". This is how advancement of knowledge happens.

Could be, or you could have the cart before the horse.

I liked your comment and appreciate your explanation of the data and the angle the research was coming from, but know that the majority of people here don't want to hear it as they have pre-existing bias that they refuse to look past. It's all nurture based, biological differences and resultant systemic sociological

That word doesn't mean what you think it means.

This never happened to me or anyone in my social circle. It depends on what sort of person you look at I guess.

Enjoy your circlejerk eccho chamber!

"the manosphere will continue to throw a pity-party for geeky guys who suffer the 'injustice' of not getting the hot cheerleader "

Nope, geeky guys don't want the hot cheerleader because she is dumb as fuck and shallow.

"Everyone's attracted to conventionally attractive, hot people."

Nope! I prefer people who have personality and style that is their own, rather than popular cultures prescribed style of the season.

I tell you what, I will keep on believing what the executive director of the company that made the game has repeatedly said (he's gone on record saying he is sick of people pestering for a port at this point), and you keep on believing that you know better than he does.

Edit: And speaking of proof and facts, I think

" You have no idea how much I hate these idiots. I can hold two ideas in my head at once, thanks."

Except I acknowledged your point, which you would have realised if you hadn't had a hissy fit and blocked me. I certainly hit a sore spot there didn't I?

Speaking of totalitarian regimes, what happened to my earlier comment?

I take your first point, that's fair enough if you are not viewing the American legal system as inherently superior. Your attitude implied otherwise to me, but I can accept that that was just my reading of it.

Yes, I missed the point of the paragraph, and I feel that I am still missing it. Would it be surprising if

Here's another angle, the American justice system is also pretty poor, so insulting the Chinese system is a bit "pot calling the kettle black". So it's also racist that you seem to feel you are judging them from a moral high ground that you don't actually occupy.

http://stephiblog.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/us-…

"Does it even have trials"? Lol dunno!

You could research it and say one way or the other, rather than being flippant about it. If you have a point to make then how about making it, rather than being snarky and flippant about a whole country?

She really kicks the llamas ass?

That last paragraph seems kind of lacist.

In replying to someone else I have stumbled across this page which explains in it's own way why it'll never be on anything other than Nintendo:

http://www.gamesradar.com/hoping-bayonet…

Also bear in mind that the developers said "it wouldn't have existed at all without Nintendo" so if you are going to say that isn't the

Here you go, proof that you don't know what you are talking about:

""Would Bayonetta 2 not exist without Nintendo? The answer is yes," says Atsushi Inaba, executive director at Platinum Games."

http://www.polygon.com/gaming/2012/9/…