Same goes for when you describe something as on a “kilogram-scale” and aren’t talking about measure.

When you attribute agency to nature, you are talking like a Gaia moron, not a scientist. Glad I could help.

I’m convinced that Gizmodo is actually anti-science false flag trash written and edited by idiots secretly hired by deep state handlers.

Fuck this whole page is just filled with the same bullshit regarding “natural formation” as if the meaning of “natural” isn’t rooted in the belief of a creator of one type or another. As if calling this “natural” isn’t ordaining it with some origin in divinity on up above.

Thanks for proving my point regarding your position’s reliance on arguments based in narratives of a creator. Jackass.

The most obvious flaw in this post is that you’ve granted “reality” something unique and projected the embarrassment of being unable to explain why on what you see as your opposition. You’ve ordained reality with some sort of specialness. It is *not* merely a simulation.

And you think there’s some inherent difference between what men make and what nature makes? The idea that there’s something special to our reality relative to one that’s otherwise “made up” is dumber than shit.

So I have to ask, with the simple grammatical mistakes there that make it a bit hard to follow, if you read it? There’s nothing about that rewording of the question that’s necessary if you don’t pigeon hole the ideas to be in line with a creator.

The universe isn’t built like the computer you’re typing on, is it? These questions just seem silly. Much more like “gotcha” questions than actual discussion.

Only when you conduct this conversation like a pendatic jackass is it “unproductive to any scientific conversation.”

Milo didn’t seem to mind raising waves of harassment against his targets in the past, even if they were the sort I described above. And though he had been doxxing students at the universities he’d visited previously, he was still somehow surprised that people decided they should stop it and anyone who disagreed should…

He would be in jail for what?

It’s been documented by everyone that’s actually been paying attention. Your denials are just nonesne.

1) You don’t see how anything Milo’s said justifies this because you don’t know what he’s said. Do some research. Using words like purge to target minorities, riding the wave of shit that was gamergate, doxxing students, etc all give examples of the threat he’s posed to people’s safety.

So you actually don’t know what you’re talking about, do you? You actually have no idea what Milo’s done and the consequences suffered by the innocent people he’s targeted. You also don’t understand that threatening people isn’t “political speech”. Violence isn’t ever right, but at times it is absolutely necessary.

You’re right. We ran this in a fairly massive war game in 2002. They smashed us in two days. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002#Exercise_action

It’s actually shit. He gets an expert to tell him that Flynn isn’t a Russian mole, quotes him, and then concludes that he looks like one. And he puts it under the heading “Flynn Looks Like a Russian Mole”. According to the expert he quotes, he doesn’t.

We have statements from CBP that orders are coming straight from Trump and same coming from the administration. It might seem subtle now, but it isn’t. Judges’ orders are being refused. Congress is also being stonewalled. They have literally been hung up on. Either Trump capitulates to Judicial checks, which seems…

Looks like he’s actually braking.

Look, I’m not expecting anything but the worst from Trump. But making shit up isn’t going to help. I guarantee it.