malkman-m
Malkman
malkman-m

How the fuck did he “get Trump elected”? This isn’t fucking Tammany Hall. Clinton lost. All of this hysteria is about placing blame for HRC’s disgraceful failures and it serves the interests of the worst people on the planet: war profiteers. If you don’t see it, fuck you.

You mean when he said HRC should but wouldn’t be prosecuted? Yeah, a lot of people said that. A list of them can be found here.

Based on what? Why do you “think” that?

When was he ever not partisan? When has he ever said he didn’t have an agenda? Maaaaaaaybe you’re just full of shit and don’t like that Assange made a complete fucking mess out of the assholes running the DNC, but you aren’t going to get away with lies.

Wait, so are you just for real dumb? You think Wikileaks had Republican emails and just held on to them?

So Wikileaks is Republicans now?

Funny, every single poll showed Bernie with a much bigger lead over Trump than Hillary, which had been fairly consistent up until that last week or two. You’re clearly full of shit. The whole “communist” nonsense only worked with people who by now are mostly six feet under.

Are you really serious? Do I need to show you the emails? Do you think Donna was laying these questions at the campaign HQ’s doors anonymously? How the hell is coordination between the campaign and a mole at CNN not evidence of wrongdoing by both? I keep seeing otherwise rational people bending over backwards to

Yeah because donors from places like Saudi Arabia are giving to charity because they are so concerned for human rights.

Most assholes on here just eat it up, too. And even after leaks like this,

You are simply going along with a very obvious effort to slime her campaign. Let this asshole explain exactly what it is you’re doing,

That isn’t evidence.

You aren’t a scientist, are you? And you aren’t actually bothered to do even a simple search, either?

It’s fucking spectacular how unlimited money has transformed elections into a raging pandemic of memes designed to smear opponents. There’s nothing about Jill Strein that is anti-science or anti-vaccine. So first of all, fuck you and the staff at Gawker that’s spreading these smears. Second, congratulations. You are

If anything is pseudo- or quasi-scientific, it’s this idea that anything is “a natural fact of existence”. This whole article is little more than some weak attempt at being edgy.

Except for the fact that just about every public statement she made about her email was proven to be a lie by both the FBI and State. And a few other (very, very weird) examples like the sniper fire in Bosnia. And the Elizabeth Warren example of how she has in fact shifted positions as a result of the money she