PS Here’s a perfectly relevant grilling of the State Dept spox,

Its a spoofed email domain to make it look like it came from a legitimate source.

Multiple intelligence agencies have been willing to stand in front of their bosses in the Admin and multiple Congressional committees and report the same thing with a high level of confidence.

and I doubt the NSA wants the Kremlin to know about any back doors they

So the people raising the accusations don’t need to discuss evidence, but I do? I need to come up with evidence about another actor before I can demand evidence? Go fuck yourself, that’s ridiculous. And quit making shit up. I’m not saying they’re lying their asses off. I’m saying they are leveling accusations without…

When have I ever demanded to see evidence first-hand? Can you please explain your need to be completely fucking ridiculous?

What evidence. This all started with you being ridiculed for believing this is all without any evidence. I don’t need an alternative theory. I’m saying there’s no evidence and there is every reason to be suspicious. I don’t need evidence to demand evidence.

This is fucking priceless. Hi, have you heard of this guy named Snowden? You might want to read about him and his experience with the NSA. Even better is how you claim that only a handful of orgs like the Russian FSB are capable of putting together a phishing attack using spoofed urls that could successfully spear…

The evidence presented by Vice shows that it was likely carried out by known Russian groups like Fancy Bear, etc. However, the evidence doesn’t substantiate the claims being made by the CIA, and that’s the point. The evidence behind these claims isn’t being discussed because, as Vice says, “None of this new data…

Then find one with evidence and cite it. I’m not just coming here and telling you there is no evidence. I’m looking at these stories and telling you, there is no evidence being reported.

Acting like an arrogant little prick is a shitty substitute for an argument. You might try writing an actual rebuttal.

LOL, you’re serious, aren’t you.

I also find that many people think you’re full of shit. Maybe you shouldn’t make silly claims about made up people being “oddly credulous about whatever Russia friendly sources are counterclaiming”.

Over what specific issue? You’re talking about hacking and bringing up a story about Russia and homosexuality. That’s two issues.

There’s literally no discussion of evidence. There is no explanation of how any of these claims have been established. It isn’t hard to find this sort of discussion, but it isn’t being covered by any of the government hacks.

No, evidence is NEVER “someone claims something”. Evidence is what claims are based on. Evidence is interpreted and used to make claims. Claims short of evidence are bullshit.

So were you going to post something with evidence?

Congratulations, you’ve convinced everyone you’re a fucking moron.

Shut the fuck up, that’s just ridiculous. I’m not “OK” with hacking, I’m just not as outraged by the source of the leaks as I am by what was actually contained within it. The fact that you are more concerned with the source of disclosures than you are the corruption it exposed makes you a jackass. And trying to call…

I can’t help but point out the perverse logic of qualifying the release of information showing DNC/HRC/PAC/media collusion as “interfering”.