Why? What “more information” would the baker need to get from a customer?

This is by far one of the most ignorance-fueled articles I have ever read in my entire life.

So I guess making others the unwilling victims of your exhibitionist desires is perfectly ok provided you are a woman? Ok, got it.

It was not the director who called the women "unknowable" - it was the writer of the article for Deadline (who happens to be a woman, by the way).

Yet you choose to critique a film that has not yet even been made.

Where, exactly, does the director claim that to be what this movie is? The only one here claiming that is the writer of this article - and their linked source article doesn't even support that claim.

Are you under the impression that "Gravity" is a documentary about the weakest of the four fundamental forces?

Where does the director claim it to be "a movie about women" or dedicated to "how they live their lives in the 20th century"? Where does he claim it to be "breaking new ground"? Where does he claim to be trying to change things "when it comes to how women are represented in media"? Where does he claim to be "speaking…

Where does the director claim the film to be "shredding [sic] light on that mysterious and unknowable species, women!"?

Where, exactly, does the director claim that the movie will be "about 20th century women"?

Where does the director claim the film to be "shredding [sic] light on that mysterious and unknowable species, women!"? He is very clear and in saying that it is about his own experience growing up around the women he grew up around.

Between this story and the source article, the only one who seems to be presenting it as (claiming to be) a story "about women" is the writer of this article. The director calls it an "ode" to the women who raised him - that is not the same as claiming it is or presenting it as "about women". He is very clear and in…

Between this story and the source article, the only one who seems to be presenting it as (claiming to be) a story about women is the writer of this article. The director calls it an "ode" to the women who raised him - that is not the same as claiming it is or presenting it as "about women". He is very clear and honest…

I think the issue has more to do with kids being left unsupervised (which is how many of the cases you mention occur) at too young of an age - not whatever their destination may be.

"Anyway it's an interesting reminder that the red carpet gauntlet is seemingly designed to reduce women to fabric, jewelry, and manicures — a kind of lesson in objecthood."

I once heard an interview with a librarian on NPR who referred to herself as a "libarian".

Previously known as "Book Neck" and "Magazine Neck" and "Newspaper Neck".

I am glad I could point out to you the fact that you are a complete joke, as shown by your own words and reasoning.

It's a tattoo machine, not a tattoo "gun".

How does this prove that the "before" photos are fake?