Your not wrong per se. But the second ammendment is important in that the interpretation of it by courts is going to likely hamper the chances of any meaningful change.

Not shocking. Still to bad that they don’t seem to be doing more to either support him or at least give him until workers comp is done to accept a position or be terminated.

You could. It's a bit messy though. :p

“that she believes anti-choice politicians were only trying to end an “elective procedure on a completely healthy fetus,”

Ah, Earth X.

Fair point.

Not really eugenics. The examples you have given.

Doesn’t really seem like harrassing protestors is what is causing him to go to jail. More of the assaulting with a deadly weapon and such.

? Pretty sure we know his name, area he lives and former profession. I would be willing to bet it isn’t that hard to find out where he lives (or at least the last place he lived at). Not that I am encouraging doing someone, just you know; not super hard to find that info.

Was anyone denying that what thier amicus brief shows was the case?

Wasn't he blocked from doing this from his conviction?

Hold the nun and shouter in contempt and throw them in jail for a few weeks.

That's generally what I have assumed from places I worked for that had that clause (mostly fast food).

So, no consequences then. The subtitle (or whatever the text below the title is called) definitely implied some, but then the article doesn’t deliver.

Not gonna lie, would have wrather any other company getting the streaming rights. In my experience, Ubisofts online tied services suck.

Depends on what perpetuity means in whatever area the deal is signed for. Most US states limit perpetuity to a few decades for instance.

I think your making way more out of the donation itself than it deserves.

You can however be Libertarian (as in the specific party which is the most common libertarian movement in the US). Which does tend towards right wing libertarianism but has a pretty large overlap of just Republican light who like to smoke pot.

So why does the article say published on August 20th but there are comments (mine included) from July?

Yeah, at best the manufacturer may settle out of court. But the seller, body armor maker, and social media companies? I don’t see those being successful by any means.