I mean Uwe Boll isn't helped by the fact that he basically took the buisness lessons from the Producers (Germany has a number of grants that basically let him profit even on a relative flop).
I mean Uwe Boll isn't helped by the fact that he basically took the buisness lessons from the Producers (Germany has a number of grants that basically let him profit even on a relative flop).
Well that blows. Not a surprise though.
I mean a mob doesn't need to all be in on it. For instance, not everyone who believes that stupid QAnnon shit is aware of anything past the claims.
Wouldn’t he still be contributing to the delinquency of a minor if her parent wasn’t cool with it (I assume Marky Mark thier is suppose to be her dad).
Yeah, I mean dude shouldn’t have assaulted her (and if he was alive I would very much want him arrested as well). But she had other options to deal with the situation than gun. And I don’t feel a fire arm should just be accepted as the response to an unarmed attack. Also chasing after the guy when he fled is quite a…
Yes. I think lethal weapons should only be used in situations where one is being used or chance of death/ maiming is unusually high (such as being attacked by a large number of attackers).
“On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled to restrict affirmative action and eliminate race-conscious admissions in higher education.”
2 things.
People also regularly die from falling and choking.
Well yeah. You can kill someone by throwing a baseball or a rock at them if it hits them right and with enough force. But I usually wouldn't say opening fire on a bunch of teenagers chucking rocks at you should be seen as an acceptable reaction.
Yes. Bare hands by definition aren’t generally seen as lethal weapons. A gun is.
As long as they knew about the son chasing after and her telling him too, seems like a good enough reason to arrest to me. Even if they later decided against going to trial.
So why is shooting someone considered similar force to an unarmed attack?
I thought 360 only pulled 2nd in the US and a few other areas.
Oh, the PS1 and N64 had exclusives that Nintendo and Sony dealed to get. Crash and Spyro being 2 examples.
? Not really. Intellivision and Atari still had exclusive games. Nintendo tried to force it and then Sega as well. But it wasn't super uncommon before that.
The PS2 wasn't a joy to develop on either (really odd architecture). Heck, it was bad enough that it got compared to the Sega Saturn.
I would generally agree (with the golden rule bit). But generally you aren’t talking to someone who’s policy decisions are screwing you over.
If you are a public official and need to demand respect, I think you are proving you don't deserve respect.
“the almost unrecognizable bench”