I obviously consider direct threats to be potential reason to use violence. Hence “but as long as they aren’t being violent or threatening you or someone else, you”.

I don't think he intended to kill him. And given the charge he caught, I don’t think the DA believes that either.

So no more $5 coupon per Month?

The multiple news stories of people saying he hadn't attacked anyone on the train. Pick one. The Root and Jezebel both have ones. So Does CNN.

? Why? I don’t think it’s particularly helpful to his image or proves anything, but I don’t expect someone to give me a specific country if they plan to travel through a bunch of them (i.e. backpacking through Europe).

I mean if he was smart he wouldn’t have choke out someone who wasn’t being violent. Crazy people have break downs, it’s not a comfortable thing to watch; but as long as they aren’t being violent or threatening you or someone else, you really don't need to respond with violence.

To be fair, thier actual news programs use to do more fact checking (like with Shepherd Smith saying that the entertainment branch was lieing).

Let’s be fair. There are probably multiple criminal conspiracies. I can’t believe that this is the only time something happened that they covered up.

So I'm glad the 3 are getting charged; but what about the other 2?

On the one hand, games have been around $60 for decades despite cost of development going up. On the other hand distribution and manufacturing costs have went down and the audience much is larger.

“Fuck you to Rudy Giuliani for responding to a former employee’s horrific allegations of sexual abuse by essentially slut-shaming her.”

I responded to a comment saying “Even if she was in the right, which she very clearly was not, it wouldn’t change the fact that she was performatively weaponizing white...”

What's the poll dancing girl in the image from?

From what I heard about her claims she said that she already had the bike in hand when they took it from her. So if she is telling the truth, I would still say that is taking something from her.

On the one hand yes. On the other hand Vulcan should have come back instead.

Why if she is right should she not cry. If she is right they are trying to take something from her. Seems like as good a time as any to do what you can do to hold on to it.

I mean, to put it a way that Marco would understand; they are no anti-Catholic than nun porn. Not that these drag queens are inherently sexual, but parody isn’t necessarily about hating something.

So, would these ads advocating false medical claims run afoul of false advertising laws? I mean juice companies have gotten in trouble for making untested claims, let alone ones that most research says is harmful.

Not mutually exclusive terms.

Gonna take the taxi drivers word on this. He got his fare. PR guy and private security are still on Harry’s employment.