You realize that isn’t hoe small impoverished economies work, right? It’s the same reason sending a bunch of finished lumber to a remote area that does It’s own production is going to impact local loggers and millers (think thats the term, people who work at a saw milk).

Well, since someone replied to him that wasn’t Grey, I assume that ungreyed them. They are a very effective troll.

Yes, because forced sterilization by the government works out so well.

Do want the buisness reason or the fairies and rainbows explanation?

Eh. It would have been in the red still. But his actions have lead to a decent drop in ad revenue. He should have scaled down it’s staff (as it had grown much quicker than it could support financially), but with an actual eye to maintain revenue.

Framed as in how you frame an argument. Like how you present your case. Not framed as in framing someone for a crime.

“Fuck you to Louisiana House Republicans for passing a bill to require every public school classroom to display a poster with the motto “In God We Trust.””

“including its framing of Heard as Depp’s abuser for fighting back against him.”

Eh, I’m not really worried about the glass cliff in this case. Dude who is owner and ran it into the ground is staying on as an executive controlling the product. Any one with a brain would buy that he killed any success she could achieve. Especially if he keeps tweeting.

I didn't explain what I meant. I assume the contract has provisions for donation or destruction of viable inventory. So they don't pay per shoe, but likely can't simply give them away or destroy good ones without him getting a cut. I could be wrong though.

Are they contractually able to do anything with them without giving Kanye his cut? I mean, he's hardly been showing the best judgement, but I assume his lawyer was good enough to make sure he gets payed regardless of what way Adidas uses the sneakers.

Same. Also the parents of a number of the students should be suing (kid has a history of violent actions against other kids, plus you know traumatizing a bunch of them by shooting the teacher).

Dude collects losing verdicts like people collect baseball cards.

Or just essentially confess on the stand. 

Eh, I guess I was angling to point out that the school is a shit show. Which has more to do with the Teacher’s lawsuit (and any parents who sue) than the mother’s criminal proceedings.

I don’t really think geriatric pregnancy vs a geriatric fathering children is sexist. A woman’s age obviously has much more effect on the development of the fetus and the potential of negative consequences for their own body since they carry it. The only thing his age effects is the quality of his sperm and chances of…

She shouldn’t have been required to be there. For a whole host of reasons that is a disservice to the child, staff, and other children.

It's a state law. And most likely only gets charged when something like this happens.

Sorry, overlooked that part. Thanks for the civil response.

Yes. But as long as you need that paycheck for housing, it still effectively means your employer controls your housing situation. Less direct obviously.