It’s Tiffany. She has to eat under the table.
It’s Tiffany. She has to eat under the table.
It is the Trump household! Even the furniture inappropriately touches you!
“We don’t care!” yelled supporters in the crowd
The Economist’s new cover:
I am finding it crazy how Trump and all the maniacs who support him have been bleating to anyone who puts a mic in their face about how awful Hillary Clinton was to Bill’s accusers/mistresses yet they don’t seem to see any hypocrisy in how they now are reacting to Trump’s accusers. We have Trump himself on tape…
Please let it be Ivanka.
YES SHE FUCKING DOES NEED TO EXPLAIN IT. People are fucking stupid. And ignorant. And in denial. The deplorables are twisting themselves in knots trying to get the message out that women lie and don’t matter and who cares if Trump sexually assaults women. Much of the country already believes that it does matter. We…
Fun Fact: Toddler Nom never crawled. Never. This is not an exaggeration.
I saw that elsewhere and was hoping it would be here. Apparently the bloated bloviator thinks that consent is somehow a liberal plot to undermine....well, I am not sure what it undermines except for rapey conservative men.
Also this seems like the bitter talk of a man who has tried to convince dozens of women to have a threesome with him, but never succeeded.
Clearly Newt Gingrich has shown the capacity for deep empathy for women. I love that he’s trying to fight Clinton’s again just like it’s the 90s, and he’s losing even worse this time.
It’s a “compliment”. It’s Midwest, pro league, passive aggressive shade dressed in a wholesome, upbeat sweater set.
I assume “Jesus” is an affordable Napa Valley Chardonnay.
I saw Tom Hanks ask Billy once on a red carpet if Billy enjoyed being such a prick. It elevated Hanks to another level in my book.
So he’s promised not to repeat being attracted to young men? Sounds reasonable.