Not that I expect this to go anywhere, but rather than give a dismissive response about “not on specific plastic box” or anything, I’ll explain why people tend to be OK with exclusives like Halo or Infamous or Ghost of Tsushima, but tend to have issues with things like the Activision/Blizzard and Bethesda purchases.

Especially since the “myth” per their own article was “within 12 months” and the article admits it plummeted in ranks and sales dropped fast...

It also doesn’t even disprove the myth. The quote they give where Microsoft admits the issues was “decline in base game sales 12 months following their addition”. And then they admit that Starfield plummeted in ranks very fast. Like... if anything this proved the myth. Even a massive game like Starfield with all its…

The funniest part is that the tutorial for the game tells you Let’s Go is activated with R.  At least for the English version.

I feel everyone is acting like “Microsoft wouldn’t make it exclusive” are only thinking short term. I 100% agree they wouldn’t. They are correct that due to the market share right now it would be a terrible idea to cut out the Sony sales.

But for how long?

As a first party studio, Call of Duty will become free on…

So much this. I used to consider myself conservative, but nowadays they’ve just run away from the entire core belief.

The people who defend someone being fired for inappropriate remarks always amuse me. If you walked in to your job and started talking about the Holocaust and Nazis PERIOD, much less trying compare yourself while mocking the pronouns of a transgender coworker you’d be fired. Period. Full stop.

As someone who was once in the Criminal Justice field, yes. And the cops are required to investigate it. Just because the product was illegal does not mean you were not robbed from. Given, if they recover them you better have a good reason after they return them to you.  :P

Its worth cutting price to them because it ensures all games come through Playstation Network where they get most retail. Thus you take a loss on console to ensure increased revenue on game sales. Its fairly common and most expected it to be $100 cheaper for that reason. But they are identical other than the disc.

Its worth cutting price to them because it ensures all games come through Playstation Network where they get most retail.  Thus you take a loss on console to ensure increased revenue on game sales.  Its fairly common and most expected it to be $100 cheaper for that reason.  But they are identical other than the disc.

Having played the demo and excited for full game tomorrow, yes. Yes I can say that. Because I’m not playing a VR Iron Man game just to move around and shoot things with a controller. I’m playing it to FEEL like Ironman. You can claim “Oh worse controls for immersion”, but like, that’s why I’m playing a VR Iron Man…

Body Oder

100% the first. Watched the video and he is laughing and giggling about how he can’t miss. Laughing at how he ‘gonna get banned’. He used a spare PC to hide IP, made spare accounts to “protect himself” from the “fortnite polite or whoever watching”.

Laughed at how the aimbot made him so good, etc.  All while going…

I feel the need to slightly correct the arena feathers thing. In addition to the 1600 that most people notice there is a ranking system ranging from 500 to 5000 extra feathers (for ranks 1-100,000). In addition you can get some feathers if your AI team wins against players ranging from 100-500.