“We don’t care about identity politics or if you’re gay or whatever, just act like we think you should.”

A gay man that literally acts in all the ways they think a man should act but happens to be gay.

“WE HATE HIM BECAUSE HE’S GAY.”

Look, I’m not saying that asking conservatives to be consistent is hopeless, but asking…

What you say is intellectually consistent with the belief that all need to be treated equally.

Given the online nature I think there was a reasonable expectation this would be supported for more than a year

I love when people who say they’re okay with homosexual/interracial romance in TV/movies, but ONLY if it isn’t shoed-in, otherwise it’s just pandering. Wtf does that even mean? I don't see people saying that when it comes to straight or same race relationships.

“The straights” is not a thing though. There’s no long-standing history of the term being used to demean that group, to take away their rights, and block them from opportunities the same way terms like “queers” or “the gays” has for a long time. There’s not a lot of historical events where the majority were queers who…

If you are a fan of the game and have knowledge of the following events, not just in Part 1 but also Part 2, I can’t possibly imagine how you could feel like the episode has no purpose.

The sign off is truly the cherry on top “Please don’t refute my argument using facts, logic, or historical precedent". Oh, ok then. 

I’m unhappy, and it makes me even more unhappy when I see gay people happy!

“Your prejudice is just as awful as the people who are review bombing.”

LOL!!! Please tell me this was parody. Or don’t. Either way I laughed really hard at the absurdity.

The Pepe kids must especially pissed that their favorite cranky libertarian TV avatar played a gay man.

I no longer care.  None of that is going to affect ratings in any meaningful way.  Companies care about ratings.  But im glad that the conservatives continue to do everything they can to ensure zoomers and millenials never vote for them in significant numbers.

It’s absolutely in bad faith. If it had been Bill and Jill, they wouldn’t have been able to stop talking about how someone was cutting onions because it’s impossible to say that someone moved you so much that you started crying.

It’s like the literal Fascists who go around comparing themselves to Frodo and the Fellowship of the Ring. Some people are beyond helping.

“Looks like the most popular choice is to say the episode had no purpose.”

Not surprising. I’ve been seeing everywhere people tying themselves up in knots trying to come up with some kind of criticism to cover their homophobia. Looks like the most popular choice is to say the episode had no purpose.

The first powered flight occurred in 1903 and it took 11 years for the first commercial passenger flight to happen. That passenger flight in all it’s glory is that they could fly a single person 20 miles, twice a day. It cost the equivalent of $150 one way. It’s not until 30 years later in the 1930's that commercial…

The thing with this “VR is just a fad! It was around in the 90s, and it failed then, so it’ll fail now too!” argument, is it asserts the reason it didn’t succeed in the 90s is because VR as a concept is unworkable. As opposed to the real reason: bulky, heavy, low refresh CRTs, laggy tracking and 2D sprite-based…

I don’t really know what they want to do with their VR metaverse, but I think you’d get a lot more traction just taking Final Fantasy 14, and turning it into an MMO chatroom (which I’m sure someone will point out it already is :P ). I don’t want to look like a shitty Mii or Xbox avatar. Let me attend meetings as a…