Wolfenstein: The New Order was 44GB, and that was an amazing game ;)
Wolfenstein: The New Order was 44GB, and that was an amazing game ;)
Honestly, probably Postal 2. Don't get me wrong it was pretty fun, but man some of the things you could do in that game were pretty freaking disturbing.
Oblivion had a pretty strong opening cinematic in my opinion:
Well, there's your problem then...
What kind of crap rig are you playing on? Vanilla maps haven't been freezing for months, at least not for me or for my friends. Likewise I haven't had a problem with the Second Assault, Naval Strike, China Rising or Dragon's Teeth maps.
Oh stuff it! First of all it was Hardline beta, not Homefront, Hardline has nothing to do with Homefront, and doesn't feel like Homefront.
And also child labour!
That really depends on how much you overclock. My previous GPUs got an extended lease on life due to overclocking.
AMD, no over-clocking and pre-applied thermal paste..... WHAT HAPPENED?!?!?!
Because of this comment, I shall prepare a pineapple & ham pizza for dinner tonight :D
Did I say I was okay with it? No I didn't. I was not justifying it. I was merely saying that the response was to be expected. That is not a justification for the response..... You want to hear something funny? Sarkeesian would never have faced the same level of hatred, had she gone the same route as other scientists,…
Yes, it is to be expected. If you hadn't noticed, this is the internet, the only place on Earth where someone can be truly anonymous. Trolls and haters are attracted like moths to a flame when there's a chance. And on YouTube, they always come out of their holes, especially when it's a sensitive subject. If you post…
I know, however, that response was to be expected, considering the topic. But I wasn't referring to the troll or hate comments, I was referring to legitimate scrutiny from the scientific community, which she has completely ignored (So has her followers). How can you admire someone who blatantly refuses to listen to…
She is doing a study, which is exactly why it should face the same kind of scrutiny as any other scientific study, but she doesn't allow it. For this reason, I decline to to view her work as scientific, which she states that it is.
Anita Sarkeesian is a fucking fraud. I respect people who try to equalize the sexes, I really do. But the academic in me cringes every single time someone uses Anita Sarkeesian as a credible source. Her work is far from scientifically valid and her "research" is barely passable. Not to mention that she cherry picks…
PC Name: Main PC
I have performed many organ transplants on my PC!
Don't do that! My single 4K 144Hz G-Sync ASUS monitor would leave any of those three screen in the dust!
7th of October is going to be damn expensive!
Who shot first?