So...you're doing the opposite of the headline? 

Yyou've seen the movie? And you're 100 percent certain it portrays him as a hero?

One, huh?

Scapegoating art is stupid.

Yeah, what does a pussy like Phoenix know about loss?

First rule about Killing Harvey Weinstein, WE DON'T TALK ABOUT KILLING HARVEY WEINSTEIN.

Will Smith would have been excellent, though.

“Ah yes, I was wondering what would break first: your body or your sense of reasonable attire.”

Yeah, how dare they not realize that this might be superficially similar to a 96 book.

“he seemed like a decent dude overall”

It was revealed in S1. Shiv, Connor, and Ken used to play a game where they would lock Roman in a cage and have him pretend to be a dog, going so far as to have him eat dog food. Connor remarked that Roman enjoyed this game.

Is the W word Wombo?

Lol, look at This post.

Any movie based on a comic book property is a comic book film. It’s hilarious that you think that this committee is not open to genre films, but you refuse to be open to what a comic book film can be.

Yeah, dude, they awarded the movie an award to stick it to Marvel movies. You figured it out.

Except Todd Philips begged WB to make it a Joker film, and the movie has both Batman and his father as well as Arkham in it.

I like how you told that guy to not make assumptions, but the rest of your posts is nothing but speculation, from the quality of a movie you haven't seen to what that woman said in an interview with marvel.

Poor Marvel.

A universally loved Batman trilogy? Synderverse really only makes up 4 movies. I’m not sure that’s enough to say they always make the wrong choice. Also, they got the best young actor today to play Batman and the best actor today period to play Joker. I’m not sure their decision is so bad now.

Seems like a reasonable conclusion based on a teaser.