I've done much research since I originally wrote that post and virtually every piece of "evidence" against Steven that I've found that was left out was dubious or circumstantial in the extreme. I've seen that article, and it's rather salacious (and it also has some misinformation in it).

"…or else Sherry Culhane (the same person who yielded the exonerating results for Avery's 1985 case) to have faked results, or else contaminated them in the lab. I don't know. But it seems to me the "framed" angle may have narrowed a bit."

Of course, I was just responding to "there is supposedly evidence…" which I'd seen time and time again in the last week with no substantiation. I've actually read up quite a bit on the calls since I made that post, and now know the number and timeline of them.

Um… wrong.

Yes, he was using the very reason it was hard to swallow the idea that Steven committed the crime as an excuse to impose even harsher penalties. It reminded me of that inane Catch-22 statement of that horrible DA Kratz, "Reasonable doubt is for the innocent." It was surely not a good picture of the Wisconsin judicial…

Yes, especially since a few of them have more violent histories against women than Steven did, hadn't spent 18 years in prison for a crime they didn't commit, and weren't on the cusp of becoming multimillionaires.

On December 22, 2015, The Innocence Project issued a statement in regard to the Netflix documentary "Making a Murderer", stating "a member of the Innocence Network is currently looking into some aspects of his case.

Here is a portion of document filed by Avery's lawyers before the case began (in accordance with Wisconsin's Third Party Liability law) listing other potential suspects. The court denied the defense the right to bring these people up as potential suspects in court.

Here is a portion of a doc. filed by Avery's lawyers before the case began (in accordance with Wisconsin's Third Party Liability law) listing other potential suspects. The court denied the defense the right to bring these people up as potential suspects in court.

Here is a portion of a document filed by Avery's lawyers before the case began (in accordance with Wisconsin's Third Party Liability law) listing other potential suspects. The court denied the defense the right to bring these people up as potential suspects in court.

BTW, for rock-solid evidence against the idea that Avery was framed, it would be good to find evidence of non-blood DNA that was gathered from crime scene evidence before Avery was charged for the murder and had his DNA sampled by police.

My initial response, without researching any further than your postings, is that what Kratz is saying indicates either that:

"Your repeated suggestion that I haven't watched the series I find annoying and condescending, and presumably motivated by a desire to undermine someone you perceive to be an opponent in debate."

The level of my interest in this particular case stems from the fact that my parents live two counties over from where the events took place, and many other members of my family live just a little further away than that. Otherwise, I suspect I would still have an interest, but I doubt I would be commenting as much…

One point you left out: someone was checking Theresa's voicemails on Nov.2nd, a day before she was reported missing (and according to the prosecution, Avery had already destroyed the phone), but the judge wouldn't let the defense mention this fact at trial.

But the Avery Salvage lot was her last stop for the day; anyone would know that by talking to her. So I don't see what following her has to do with anything. It's seems you're jumping to the same conclusion as the police and many others and just assuming Avery is guilty because it's the last place she was seen alive.…

No, although the defense lawyers bring it up in the trial.

But your scenario could work, more or less, the same if it's the boyfriend or the roommate that does something stupid to her. It doesn't have to be stalking. The gravel pit would be an ideal - and remote - place for anybody that lived in the vicinity to try to get rid of the body and car (it just happens to be not…

Is that the same Kratz that resigned from office and had his law license suspended after at least 5 women complained of being sexually harassed by him (at least one of whom was a victim of domestic abuse)?

Feel free to post links to articles where your prosecutor describes, in detail, exactly which inmates said what, what each inmate is in prison for, and whether said inmate will receive anything in return for said testimony.