"He's also subhuman scum that killed and tortured a cat."

1) I believe they mentioned the blood on the hood latch in the doc (although perhaps I read it somewhere else). In any case, they said there were multiple blood samples (6, I believe) from Avery found around the vehicle, so I'm not sure if it makes any substantial difference to the prosecution's case if this specific…

Well, they showed Brendan's score on paper and I think it was 73, but I found it hard to believe.

OMG, was that dumb… they all killed Scotty (even Cole was partially to blame)!

Look we don't agree with each other, OK? You want to believe that just because this guy had some violent episodes 20 years in his past, he's automatically the guilty party. That's exactly what all the townspeople, the cops, the prosecution, etc. all believed as well. That's why, regardless of whether the guys were…

I get that. Although I tend towards the presumption of innocence, I fluctuate about the men's guilt. The sad fact is, given the stakes riding on these convictions (i.e. jurisprudence in Wisconsin will likely be in shambles if they are overturned), barring some new conclusive evidence or unequivocal confession, it's…

While I think it's fine to remain skeptical of Avery's (and Dassey's) innocence, I think it's impossible to watch this documentary objectively and remain skeptical about whether they received due process - which seems to be the focus of the filmmakers POV.

As mentioned a dozen times already, he threatened his cousin with a gun 20 years earlier.

The police took control of all of the Salvage lot property on Nov.5th - and kept control of it for the next 8 days. Are we to believe that the police didn't take many samples from the garage floor and floors of the trailer during this time? Are we to believe that the police didn't check for the use of bleach to clean…

But then why are you asking me questions which are answered in the documentary? 8 hours ago you wrote, "For instance I don't rightly know what efforts were made to tear up the garage floor…" But that is clearly shown in the documentary. Now you ask about the timeline of the garage excavation - again, clearly shown in…

"Previous trips" was a reference to "…that on previous trips to Avery's property he answered the door wearing only a towel" which suggests to me that he answered the door more than once wearing a towel - not that there were previous trips to the Salvage lot by Halbach, which Avery readily admitted in a TV interview on…

First of all, I would suggest you watch the documentary, which is what people are actually commenting on here, and which would provide you with much interesting information.

Again, your details are a little misleading: "previous trips" is actually a single trip, and when you read the details it sounds fairly innocuous (I believe it's happened to me at least once in my life) and not at all like she "complained" - plus she didn't tell the details to her manager, but rather the receptionist…

Well, I'd certainly love to see an interview with Kratz - but since he had to resign from office and had his law license suspended (although I don't know the current disposition of that) - I'm not sure whether Wisconsin (and Calumet County) DOJs wouldn't distance themselves from any remarks he might make.

"There is plenty of evidence to suggest that he did kill the girl."

While I would agree that Avery is certainly no saint, some of your "facts" are rather misleading.

I just noticed another piece of misinformation in your post:

To me, one of the most telling pieces of evidence implying a conspiracy was the telephone call on the morning of Nov.5th, from Calumet County Detective Weigert to Manitowoc County Detective Remiker telling him that his "boss" wants him to go out and reinterview Steven Avery, as well as to ask the "citizen" search…

Ok, but let's not forget that this is the same Kratz that:

Nope. Quite the opposite.