madcowgirlv2
MadCowGirlv2
madcowgirlv2

Iwan Rheon brings it so hard. Everyone haaaaaates Ramsay so much because he brings such a gleeful, committed portrayal. Also, I’m very uncomfortable with how attractive I find him.

I can't understand why Iain Glen is so overlooked! He is the heart and soul of the Mereen scenes.

Took the words right out of my mouth

I do not understand why Emilia Clarke keeps getting nominated. At all. Lena Headey is fucking amazing. Totally get that she has gotten multiple nods. But I think that Emilia Clarkes acting really isn’t all that great (in some instances outright bad). Especially in comparison to some of the heavy hitters on that show.

it also depends on if they campaigned/what they submitted

Tobias Menzies is ridiculous in that show, I hate Randall SO MUCH and he’s terrifying, but then Frank I just want to gently stroke his hair until he falls asleep.

queen of thorns got a nod for guest actor which is awesome

Nah, fuck this. They had a chance to cancel this when it actually meant something, and they didn’t. The “special” is their way of testing the waters for a Jill/Jessa spinoff and of financially capitalizing on the continued interest in the Duggars and what happens to them. I can’t decide what’s worse—pretending like

Harper Lee being wrong about a character she conjured up in her own imagination is one of the most outlandish things I’ve ever heard. It’s pure delusion to think you can define a fictional character better than the woman who brought the character to life. I can’t reconcile myself to that level of narcissism.

Everyone should read this book. Atticus Finch in To Kill A Mockingbird serves as the moral compass of white people in America when it comes to racism. He is one of literature’s most beloved characters because he is linear and one-dimensional. He allows people to believe that we always live up to our principles. He

Disclaimer: I’ve never read TKAM. It wasn’t required reading when I was in high school, probably because I’m Canadian.

Disclaimer: I’ve never read TKAM. It wasn’t required reading when I was in high school, probably because I’m Canadian.

Right, but now we have a situation where, once again, people are not talking about the rapist, but instead the women around the rapist who “let” him do it.

Why the eagerness to hold Joan and Cherie responsible for a brutal rape? They were there or they weren’t, and if they were there I certainly hope they didn’t tease Jackie about it. But even if they did, the criminal is the rapist. I fully understand Jackie being hurt and holding a grudge if it all went down as she

YES and its also entirely possible that either Jackie Fuchs, having been drugged, is remembering this wrong, or the rest of them also having been heavily into drugs/underage/psychologically vulnerable are remembering this wrong. Its entirely possible that all of them are quote-un-quote telling the truth - even if

I think there’e another layer to it, too, because of the relationship the former members seem to have. I remember when Currie revised and republished her book, putting in it that Fowley pimped her out and had a “sex ed class” where he had sex with a young woman in front of the band. I read interviews Currie did and

It’s about a lot more than that actually.

She knows better than you do, I’d assume. Seeing as she is the one who is actually in the relationship.

Is it really so selfish to want to have a nice honeymoon when your wedding is canceled? Is that what we are calling a Bridezilla now?