madattorney--disqus
madattorney
madattorney--disqus

my point was more characters need to be introduced rather than cut, not everything should be the same as in the comics.  deviation is great, without that there would be no daryl. (whom i neglected to include above and is awesome) but if they don't introduce new characters, killing off most of the main ones won't

with regards to #3, Kill! Kill! Kill!, the writers of the tv show really backed themselves into a corner by deviating from the comics.  no spoilers here, don't worry.  just realize that the tv show has already cut probably a dozen characters from the comics and added… shane.  that's about it.  so all the remaining

totally!  i thought carol was hopelessly miscast.  the show carol is a lot older and much less dynamic than comics carol.  the show seems to paint the characters in a broader brush than the comics.

as an avid reader of the comics (there will be no spoilers here) andrea is one of my faves.  she develops into the most staunch reliable badass within a dozen or so issues after amy dies.  this show is committing absolute murder to that character.  i really don't know how the writers can really salvage her or make us

shun the nonbeliever!  shuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuunnnnn.

i like giancarlo esposito's own description of acting out that scene.  he says that gus kept hearing in his head "the boy was poisoned" over and over again as if it were a clue jesse dropped.  watching that scene and imagining him thinking that makes the scene make a lot more sense.

honestly i cannot believe the number of people who agree with this theory, however this show generates a lot of thought… this seems kind of along the same red herring type deal as "jesse missed gale" or "mike was going to shoot jesse."  the show made it pretty plain that walt barely knew brock, and also that walt was