Science.

It’s actually pretty funny that the biggest performance concerns can reasonably be laid to rest by mentioning that it uses Nvidia-hardware instead of inefficient and ineffective AMD as in the past and like the competition (I have an AMD card, but what the heck). Nvidia might even make them a pretty good deal, unlike…

Looks technically like a mixture between Assassin’s Creed and The Witcher 3, with about 10% more base detail and/or draw distance.

I daresay feeling connected to Dragon Age Inquisition, and anything - or anyone - in it can be considered an art in itself. However one which many people through long training of sub-par entertainment have mastered quite well.

I daresay that green image only works on a TV-screen or OLED-tablet. (It’s just how it is with green and monitors. You can probably notice that the other colours seem more effective or complex. The purple one after it is a downright relief, although it should probably be the other way around or a tie.)

Somewhat strangely, in the game she just seems like an oldish, slim nymphomaniac, but not the ageless, stunning beauty like most sorceresses, or even her reputation.

The problem though is that this is hardly in proportion. A gamer might notice all the “nuances” but an oustider (or an occasional “visitor” to games) would think they all look “gamey” and basically the same. And yet there are severel HUNDRED percent difference in performance.

The rules are intransparent. BOOM. That is actually pretty legit. Also not bad, and along similar lines: there was nothing to indicate/expect this kind of thing to happen, or, this is just overpowered/imbalanced/unpolished/badly designed/annoying and neither fun nor interesting.

“[A]s if ... is/were”, yes, I see. I’m not a native speaker and sometimes I forget about this.

“As written, the parenthetical is sitting next to “disgusting,” not “Alicia M.” It reads—at least to me—as though the phrase is modifying “disgusting” (that is, saying that the sex tape and past are disgusting) rather than modifying “disgusting Alicia M” (that is, saying that Alicia M. is disgusting because of the sex…

Sorry, is that supposed to be good? Wouldn’t that mean one can’t judge what someone is saying based on its quality and correctness, but one can very well judge someone entirely based on a single sample of grammar? Sorry, but that seems like “Trump”-level of thinking, and one that wouldn’t be popular either in any…

I think the N64 was Nintendo’s most ambitious and self-confident project (excluding anything that has come before, for which I would use different standards, as it was kind of pre-historic or pre-conscious in some ways - anyway).

Actually, unless the tiger is leading a daily fight for survival (or something is stressing them out, as in being bothered constantly), I would guess it is very likely that they would just take it as play or something between equals and not have an extreme reaction.

I guess I get it, or the intention, but I don’t quite understand why they’re doing it that way or what’s so special about the way they’re doing it. They’re basically just talking in slightly different voices or whispering, and some of the exceedingly long sentences, statements and technical readings make it completely…

Riiiight...

The sign is actually too hard to analyze at first glance, with the jiggly tentacles, dark colours and hard to read print. And the look is too off-putting that anyway would bother looking closely and for the “message” to hit home. It’s unfortunately just looking like a “weirdo”, without significance or “irony”.

I’m partial to the N64. It is an elegant but slightly forced take on what futurism and “graphics power” looked like in the 90s and in the hands of Nintendo. There is also a certain robustness about it, like it’s a natural thing that just exists and is completely made of one part.

I guess her character theme are in truth her legs. You know these design decisions are very deliberate and don’t just happen. And she has to offer something “new” so this makes sense and is a good complement to the rest.

People with faith revel in low shots and bad character. It’s the basis and substance of their hierarchical thinking. Overblown, petty judgmentalness.

People do turn around though.