I think there should be some kind of votes which then only turn out to have some repercussions for those people... But that would be immoral.
I think there should be some kind of votes which then only turn out to have some repercussions for those people... But that would be immoral.
Er, what. It has become unwatchable because it didn’t even run when you wrote this. And last season there was the very suspenseful war in the north and the events around Jon Snow. Everything that happens afterwards SEEMS a void, but it’s not something you can watch yet (well, there’s a single episode NOW).
I bet Superman 64 is actually a first-rate state-of-the-art (mobile) game.
Well, simple. You didn’t specifically ask him the question you are speculating about now.
The fool started out telling him he is not real. And then acts scared, “I don’t know if you are real”. The exchange seems like lame roleplaying. Complete with “Mwahahaha” to start it.
Would say for aesthetic reasons and imagination. They thought this would be looking very “holographic” and they were used to this kind of quality back in the day so it lay near at hand, and they found it sufficient for the purpose and harmonious with the rest of the look.
“Howl’s sucks too. Great hair animations, but it’s Miyazaki’s most tired film, a grab bag of symbols and characters from previous works thrown together into a tedious tale that feels more like a desperate lunge at the old magic than, well, actual magic.”
Not so far from Cordon Bleu and Chicken Parmesan, when it comes down to it.
Wow, that’s really clever. From my experience however this is perfectly representative of a large portion of people, and I’m sure they would be impressed by such an argument.
“but at the end of the day a woman with an opinion is just that; and that is person who deserves to be belittled and bullied.”
I was asking a question about what would be good to do in a specific situation, got a reply, responded positively along the lines of “yes, this is pretty much how this is etc. etc.”, basically just expressing myself, describing how it is. Then he got presumptuous and patronizing, so I pointed out he was wrong. Then he…
"Leatherwing invokes the callous logic heard in post-war Germany: "I'm not ashamed of anything. That happened decades ago, before I was born. My family had good reasons for everything it did.""
That's too bad, but I'm currently into things ending and farewells, in a way, because that's how it goes (and so why not be "interested" in it as its own thing). I wish he'd at least have said 2016, just woud have seemed neater (which is still part of it, I'm not gratuitous).
I simply ignore Indie (and so much else in gaming) because it is one of the most simplistic and clichéd forms of game design (out of partly equally clichéd forms) though its existence is still probably better than its inexistence would be. I just pick up on things which have a really high reputation. I'm not…
Oh, I get it, he's a Swede, and that's so much more awesome than an annoying American Youtube personality. I agree, but I don't like all this activity (or anything about internet culture, not even communities with their self-centered micro-biotopes) and I don't think there is anything to get about it; and in any case,…
I can't believe that calf is still alive. What were these lions doing? I seriously thought the whole set up was misleading and the "wounded" calf was in truth "ground meat" calf. It seems they were really hesitant or young lions, or growing accustomed to a new member. But that calf had quite a experience, if it…
Unreal struck more a note with me than Half-Life at the time. The adventure and strangeness, graphics and music were more to my taste. But I guess you're right. Level design back then was actually a term that meant something. In magazines they would talk about "famous level/map designers". Somewhat ironically levels…
But I suppose this is more tongue-in-cheek.
This article seems kind of schizophrenic and pointless (except for the little bit about the animal-experiment - within experimental limits). If that person were more akin to you, and would remember the conversations and maybe try to vary the topics (known to happen), what the heck then? Crazy? Seems more like an…
Srsly, how often does the author have to use the adjective "strong" in order for the software to catch up on it. Thrice, with one "very strong" directly after the first, apparently is not enough. The software looks with disdain on Victorian over-definiteness... And someone needs to bugfix its domed forehead…