“You can call it terrorism, you can call it murder, you can call it whatever you want.”

That gif is awesome

Yeah, I caught the ass end of it, and, wow. He’ such a shit.

Woodrow Wilson jumps to mind as a comparison.

Does Votto go oppo a lot? I’m not really seeing the benefit of adding an extra outfielder if you’re gonna leave a normal gap in right-center and down the rightfield line, and if he is a dead opposite field hitter, how does removing your third baseman help?

They’ll have to pay restitution equal to the amount the insurance pays out (to the insurance company) in addition to whatever the court metes out for criminal penalties.

For some reason, in recent months several state legislatures have unveiled bills aimed at shielding people who drive into protesters from criminal and civil penalties.

Who can forget the battle at Aunt Teetum’s? Like we didn’t know Jill was more than just her “special friend.”

The brand would get bought out well before that, and probably by a group that would somehow be even more irresponsible.

Gotcha. It’s a pretty humorous post if you get a chance to read the whole thing. Here’s the relevant part.

Yup. Even in places with heckler veto laws on the books, they still account for the fact that the officers ultimate duty is to the public at large. Once the clashes started, if they couldn’t effectively arrest and remove the participants, nor keep the two groups separated, they needed to disperse it—which is easy to…

I knew I was feeling deja vu about how I was gonna comment.

Ditto with Sandusky.

click the link

“I believe that Daddy Fat Sacks and Three Stacks should be carved riding in a Cadillac (as is their wont). This will help the new carving blend nicely with the Confederates who are on horseback,” Williams wrote

I’d say in another 148 years there might be a chance.

It’s gotten way worse since the aughts, and seems to have accelerated under Zucker, but ratings.

I thought it was more “I really need to take a shit”

Uhh, when? They’ve been doing this “lets hear both sides of the controversy” schtick since at least the Bush II years

No one knows. Isn’t that the point of being agnostic?