I’d go with GOPcare. The entire Republican party owns this. They used bashing (and undermining) the ACA as a major pedestal for the past eight years in order to get the power they have today and this is their opus? Maybe they’re still “learning how to govern.”

Shit, at this point I’d take a warmonger*. It takes motivation, discipline, and some actual useful skills to be able to be successful** enough to get the warmonger moniker. There’s usually deficiencies elsewhere that tend to lead to catastrophic failures at some point, but there’s usually at least something in there…

So. . . He’s finally admitting Russia interfered in the election? And yet something tells me that if he’s asked directly after today he’ll still give his wishy-washy horseshit non-answer.

The optimist in me says they are tossing the potato back to the House. They want this into a conference committee with as little fanfare as possible where it can die in obscurity for the most part. Any attention it does get at that point can be mildly deflected to the other chamber but always with the caveat that…

At least it’s a different tack than trying to tie him to terrorism, so, progress?

Not attending it can’t be the acceptable answer. That’s exactly what they want.

It’s not weird at all (to them). It’s a liberal conspiracy to brainwash your children into insert reactionary scare talking point.

CNN’s Jim Acosta said that “the White House press secretary is getting to a point where he’s just kind of useless,”

That he sounds like this

The only thing I can think of to combat this is to corner at least 3 vulnerable R Senators and get them to publicly commit to being a no regardless of what’s in the bill unless the process around it is changed. Constituents, start your demonstratins

Poor timing. He should have released them just before Fox & Friends started.

So, who wants to slog through that and count?

Drumpf needs to butch up and take his medicine like a woman.

For when Trump drops this lie into one of his speeches.

Oh, the referendum was dumbfuckery of epic proportions, but once the result was in, passing the buck was the only (smart) move.

60 votes normally, not 2/3. 2/3 is to override a presidential veto and it needs to be in both the Senate and the House.

I don’t think you were going to get a good deal from the EU regardless. Now it’s just a question of how big of a barrel you get bent over, and who ends up being the scapegoat. Cameron knew what was up.

They were just trying to cultivate discussion

I would be surprised. If they wanted to establish a pattern Bharara could potentially be a witness meaning he would have to recuse himself. Even without that, there is a possible conflict of interest given how he was fired, and a definite perception of one. There’s plenty of good attorney’s out their who can do just…

A few problems. First is executive privilege only applies to “Presidential material”. Trump’s public statements may have compromised that. Second, Executive privilege does not apply to criminal issues. The argument against would be a combination that the President can’t be indicted, which has caused a lot of debate in…