It’s not even ironic in the way he is using it either. Quantity (or lack therof) =/= effectiveness, particularly when accuracy is involved. “It’s ironic no matter how many times I shoot at the target, I can’t hit the bullseye.” No, you just suck at shooting.

Oh, you mean actual “they’re sending.” Projection strikes again.

“We do not need a sense of panic in the communities,” a DHS official said in a conference call with reporters

But is Joe Flacco ELITE? Sure other quarterbacks are ELITE, but not all of them. I’m not sure if Joe Flacco is or not.

I saw an interview earlier today where one of his supporters was asked if she had lost any trust in Trump, her answer was something like, “well, he’s not a politician, and he’s rough around the edges, and he speaks his mind.” The first thought in my head was have some respect for yourself. You clearly know your being…

They’re less likely to turn him down, call of duty and what-not. Plus it’s nearly impossible to be a concientious objector with the hero worship mentality we have when it comes to our military servicemen.

He’s just like us.

H.R McMaster is an anagram for Cram The Mrs. Also Crams The Mr.

“It’s incident’s like this that led to the Omaha tragedy. Never forget.”

This is pretty important, and pretty much overlooked by anyone who can do anything about it. Trump rarely has to elaborate on anything beyond superficial statements. China, bad! TPP, bad! Wall, terrific! Crowds, tremendous!

Hmm. Pretty good job covering herself, as long as the record is in agreement. There’s a few other possible inconsistencies.

Collins’ claim on letting DeVos slide through committee, which was tantamount to confirming her, was that she always votes yes in committee in order to give the candidate a fair hearing in the full House. (Will research to see if that’s actually true.)

Woof. The denial is deep then. Tell your friend to cut their losses.

“Advise and consent” has had a bit of a sliding definition depending on, well, partisanship. In this instance it appears she is taking the approach that it is the Senate’s job to review solely the nominees ability to execute their duties, whether or not they view the nominee to be good or bad is irrelevant. The other…

It’s probably a losing battle regardless, but I don’t think directly refuting is the way to go. They need to, in a way, teach the person proper skepticism. Find out why the person believes the things they do and work on them from that angle. For example “why don’t you believe the moon landing happened?” “Because the…

It helps if you can organize a years long campaign questioning the legitimacy of the superindendant’s citizenship.

That 10 mil doesn’t even cover the “kid’s” business trips, their multiple private residences, or Melania at Trump tower.

Bridgegate pardon.

“I’m sorry you were offended”

I’m not defending Comey on this, but remember his letter was sent to Congress and it was one of those pussyfooting shitstains who leaked it, along with the details it involved Weiner. They need to fuck right off with their, “but Wikileaks wasn’t confidential material” bullshit.