Nailed it!!! 😂

Your opinion. As they say: "To each his own"

Seems most-likely the case! …

Who's your most-likable POTUS? Bush Jr.? Roosevelt?? Or someone else??? 😂

Yes, Rape is "cliché!" But what to do, life ain't ‘GoT!’

Which innuendo? Sexual only? Are you LGBT [rights activist]?

Nope. The Onion!

I beg to differ. With plethora of "subtleties" (read craziness) in [BBC®'s] ‘Doctor Who®’, I think what they did was right. Depending upon the lifestyle and psych-state of the viewer, it might not feel necessary [to spell-out a mathematician's theory]. But c'mon, urbanites watch TV to feel disconnected from the…

No, it isn't! Especially for a work of fiction which hasn't received enough of fame so far.

C'mon, he looks like that David of A.I.…!!!

“By what I can recall from his season 1 feature episode, he was just sort of along for the ride with his sister, trying to steal some piece of tech. My understanding was his sister was the terrorist, he was just guilty by association[sic]”: Amen. I think it's wise to remind you that in Episode 3 of the very same…

Couldn't Agree More!

EN-NOUGH…!!!

It seems the irony was completely lost on the whole circle!

Wanted to desperately-agree with you, but "C'mon"! Going in line with ‘D-R-C’'s statement, I would further add that he was out-of-his-mind at the moment, well, at least significantly. Apart from that biggest "what does that ambiguous/unclear message is trying to convey" thing, he also had pressure of job-hunting, and…

Doctor Who reference: Not a "pro" in that but—Bang On!!! 👏👏👏👏

Should I start funding them for the same?

“While looking at the crime scene of event 2 in mind you the same area as event 1[sic]”: Huh?? 😮

😂😂😂

“Why were doctors even trying to revive Travis? (Nevermind that you don't use defibrillators when someone's flatlined.)[sic]”: Because they got aware of his "dead" (or say 'comatose'?) body, they're doctors, ideally they're supposed to try saving the life of anyone whose case comes to their knowledge without bothering…