Absolutely the right take here :)

As a Vegas fan I agree, also; don’t allow a short-handed pp goal simply by checking properly on Sharks game 6 winner, don’t become unglued and stand around like a deer-in-the headlights and allow Sharks 4 goals on that PP.. I’ve been a hockey fan for years - call was bad, and Vegas prob would have won if not for it,…

In The NBA, they replay review ‘hard fouls’ to determine whether or not a player deliberately intended harm, or whether the contact was incidental/accidental. Then, refs can either assess a standard foul (NHL equiv minor penalty), assess a flagrant 1, or flagrant 2 (booting player from game, NHL equiv to game…

Correct take here - as a Vegas fan, I agree with your assessment of the situation, Frankly, I’m more concerned about Gallant as the head coach not calling a timeout to calm his team and jawing with opposing players - I’m also concerned about Fluery’s knee issues and his ever growing issue with stopping pucks that are…

Just a horrid analogy - this is a sporting event for gawds sake man. It’s simple, see NHL rule 59.3 and section 59 in general. Refs blew the call, period. Vegas blew the penalty kill, period. If refs do their job properly, Sharks never get that PP, but if Vegas, namely Gallant and Fluery did their jobs, they’d be…

But it’s more than one bad call. It was the 2nd time in the series they ‘guessed’ at a call. Past performance means nothing as The Crew here during this series did a poor job with bad calls going both ways. NHL is correct here IMO.