Why don't you fill me in on how James Quall and Martin Landau make my comment any less valid.

Since when has an impression gone deep? They are supposed to be brief and make a point. He hits the nail on the head with all of his impressions.

The problem is that you don't get his sense of humor!

I don't feel that the reviewer really gets the *genius* of Dana Carvey's humor— it seems to go over his head. The points that the reviewer found funny seem to be the most obvious ones— the least 'absurd' parts. Carvey is a master of the absurd- something that requires having an imagination to appreciate. I'm…