lucian-armasu01-old
lucian.armasu01
lucian-armasu01-old

Sounds like a great name for an upcoming future race: the Labori, inhabitants of Earth.

It will still arrive with Tegra 3 smartphones, but it doesn't look like Samsung will use that.

Well, if they give 4 iPads per day like they give to Best Buy stores, then of course it's selling out.

Just move on. Technology shifts like these hurt 1 million (short term), and end up benefiting 100 million or 1 billion.

Wow. Where did this author come from? Business Insider? So much sensationalism.

The new chip generations maintain the power consumption of the previous generation, even as power increases. That's their goal - to improve *only* at the same power consumption. And things happen gradually. Everyone won't move to ARM devices exactly in 10 years from now. 10% will move this year, 10% the next, and by

Extrapolating, IE 11 will not work on Windows 7. I knew there had to be a catch with Microsoft actually keeping their browser up to date for once. You *only* have to buy their latest Windows OS to get their latest browser.

I think Vista still has 15-20% market share, which means at least 100 million people.

I welcome this move from Microsoft. It can only mean IE's market share will drop even faster, which is great for the Internet.

Surpass ARM? At least a couple of years ago they had a performance advantage with Atom. Now they have both an energy efficiency disadvantage AND a performance disadvantage. Dual core ARM chips are already as powerful as this chip, and by the time this chip arrives in products, the quad core Tegra 3 and other next-gen

It looks like this chip will arrive in tablets later than Tegra 3. While Intel has been working hard to make a 1.5 Ghz chip as efficient (if you're to believe them) as an ARM chip, the ARM chips went way past it in performance. Intel is doing the same thing Nokia has been doing with Symbian 4 years after iPhone's

0.3% of 100 million is not the same with 0.3% of 1 million. The point is Google doesn't have the manpower to modify tens of thousands of homes each month, and it was probably a growing trend in Germany, too, as more people learned about it from each other and became worried.

iPhone 4 may be more like a console, but iPhone 3G+iPhone 3GS+iPhone 4 is not the same generation, and games are made to run on all of them, too, because a lot of people still have those. Instead of having one high-end model, Android has let's say 20 high-end models vs iPhone 4, 20 mid-end models vs iPhone 3GS and 20

21:9 must take only half the vertical space on iPad.

Until you'll be able to easily connect your smartphone to any screen you want in your home (kind of like Atrix but wirelessly), tablets won't be a fad. People want a bigger touchscreen and they want a more intuitive OS.

Why would the HD video playback claims optimistic? Engadget tested Xoom for HD video playback and it was more than 8 hours. Unless it has a weaker battery, I don't see why it would be optimistic.

Yeah, I'd like to see it, too, and without needing a gold card if possible, but I haven't found that myself.

Android doens't work exactly like Linux, and it will be even more closed soon. Google can demand whatever they want as long as manufacturers need the Android market and Google services,and I think the vast majority will.

Depends what you mean by consistent hardware. Does Windows have consistent hardware? It doesn't because there are a lot of levels of performance in the PC and notebook market, down to netbooks even. But what it does have is "standardization" and some kind of compatibility between all those levels. That's why Google is

I'm actually glad Microsoft won't get to have yet another overwhelming monopoly in the smartphone/tablet market. It's time for a change. Also, if you do like Microsoft products, you'll probably like them even more when they only have 15-20% of the market, because they seem to want to be a lot more innovative when they