lucian-armasu01-old
lucian.armasu01
lucian-armasu01-old

It has scroll bars and they call it tablet ready? Right.

You don't get Uranium type of radiation from your TV.

Yeah. It's kind of sad though. They've been at it for so long, even before IE existed, and they've always had a tiny market share only.

Same here.

But is that metadata open to the public, and are they specifically blocking Microsoft to use it? If they are very private API's, and it only works for Google and Apple, then that just means they have a partnership with Apple and they allow them to do that because of this partnership. Google is not forced to make the

What API's are they talking about? Doesn't Google make their own native app for iPhone, too, or is that one made by Apple? If it's made by Apple and Apple does indeed have access to special API's then I could see why they would argue, but if it's not then it just means Google doesn't want to make a Youtube app for

You can probaby do that in the future with just a phone.

I hope they don't screw it up with all the PC menu's. Apps on tablets need to be a lot more intuitive. I don't find Photoshop intuitive at all on the PC. If they just port it from the PC it will still be "meh" for those more casual users you're mentioning. They need to make a Photoshop for tablets that is easy-to-use

And people buy different Android phones because of the different skins? No, they don't. They buy them for the hardware and what other innovations can bring to the tablet (laptop dock, stylus, OnLive gaming, etc). Of course the manufacturers that are lazy will argue against this, but the real manufacturers had no

Germany plans to power 40% of the country with solar energy soon. Also in my country, Romania, we're getting 800 wind turbines (big ones) that will generate twice as much energy as our nuclear plant.

How can they promote "4G speeds" when they are slower than the 3G ones? Why isn't FCC or anyone verifying this? How can they be allowed to lie to their customers like this?

Or we can just save ourselves all the headaches thinking about that and focus our billions into solar/wind energy that are a million times safer from any natural disaster or war.

The CPU is probably not going to be a dual core, but hopefully, they can squeeze a 1280x800 or similar resolution in there on a 7" tablet. LCD's may never be as good as e-ink for reading, but having a high density screen can make text look sharp and clear (so less blurry) and make the reading experience much more

Wouldn't that work if he'd use Chrome Sync and then login on a new computer with the new history sync'ed?

I think it only lacks the JIT, which is not used in JS light websites, but should improve performance in JS heavy websites like Gizmodo and Lifehacker. I found that once Chrome 10 used the Crankshaft JIT, Gizmodo loaded much faster.

Some anandtech benchmark showed Xoom's battery life is less than 1 hour smaller than iPad 2 in all test categories (wifi, 3G, video). So for example Xoom had 10h of wifi browsing, iPad 2 11. Xoom 9h of 3g, iPad 2 10h. Xoom for video 8+, iPad 2 9+. I think Engadget also stated 9 something not 10+ for video on iPad 2.

We'll see about that, but so far all evidence proves it won't happen in 2011. If they only started making it now, then 10 months won't be enough for Nokia. While Samsung, Motorola and HTC have proved that they can release the "next-gen" phones 10 months after the previous one, Nokia hasn't proved this so far, and

Here's a crazy thought: don't put Sense on it!

Android doesn't make that kind of separation though. Both the normal browser and the embedded one get the same improvements. So I'd say it's still relevant if Apple decides to leave it like this. I don't know how it will affect "web apps" in general, since they're supposed to be in the browser anyway, but it will