luchita
luchita
luchita

my dad, 50-yr-old down to earth stoner, could care less about celebs or pop culture about anything other than Neil Young, but he just moved to nyc and lives on the same block as Cameron (her boyfriend maybe?). they've ended up walking their dogs at the same time of day on a pretty regular basis, and she has officially

Hm. I think I get the gist of what you're saying — Eccleston's Doctor is my Doctor, so I can appreciate that angle. In a way, though, I'm going to respectfully disagree. Eleven unarguably ran about and played silly, you're spot-on there, but he also spent loads of time pulling out the grim, serious and frequently

Moffat ruined Doctor Who, not Matt Smith. Bless his little heart, he did the best he could with what he was given.

I'll be in my bunk.

Moffat has "imagination without skill" as Stoppard said. He does a poor job when he's in charge as a result.

I don't know if my TV could handle that much forehead without breaking.

I know, but I have mixed feelings. My inner queer girl is saying "Yaaaay!" while my inner person-with-alcoholic-relatives is saying "Oh shit..." Michelle Rodriguez has had a lot of issues with alcohol in the past and these pics are not a good look for her recovery process.

I can't tell if it's regional, or if four years really makes that much of a difference, because I'm sixteen and I know who most of the celebrities you listed are, and of the Youtube people I have only heard of Ryan Higa, and I thought he'd kind of faded away a year or two ago.

Selena, he's a douche, what are you doing???

You sound crazy.

I'm starting to think all these celebs that get married so soon and get everyone to write about them are just trolling with us! Not stunt queens, actual people in love trolling, laughing behind our backs on their way to collect checks from Us Weekly.

Oh thank god. I was scrolling the comments section wondering if there were any other sane people here. Everyone seems to be buying into it and it's completely wrong. And calling something a "known allergen" as a fear-mongering tactic is just dumb. If you're not allergic to it, who gives a shit if it's a known

THANK GOD FOR YOU.
My idiot conspiracy theory brother gave me a lecture during thanksgiving about not using tampons because of bleach and I was aghast to find that he might have been right.

The dioxin scare may be an old urban legend and the article mostly a mess, but the point that "fragrance" is a loophole for not listing ingredients that haven't been fully evaluated for safety still stands. (For more products than tampons.)

My understanding of statistics tells me that if a product is used regularly by 40% of the population, then any kind of actual danger that product may present would be statistically obvious. Furthermore this article's conflation of "allergen" with "toxin" is outrageous. Aspirin is a potential allergen; antibiotics are

That's worrying, but I really distrust any place that claims things have "toxins" in them. It's really a meaningless word with how it's been used lately. I've seen people say sugar was a toxin.

White football player