I tried to like SHIELD and couldn't. But to answer your question: No. SHIELD is not worse than Hawaii 5-0 or NCIS: LA.
I tried to like SHIELD and couldn't. But to answer your question: No. SHIELD is not worse than Hawaii 5-0 or NCIS: LA.
Me too. All I know is that it will have something to do with Roger Ebert.
I haven't seen it, but just judging by its title, it was great.
Gangster Squad is to crime noir what Monster Squad was to horror in the 80s.
I agree with you. I don't want or need a romantic element in Sleepy Hollow.
I'm increasingly puzzled by his character. In the first episode, they made him seem like someone who knew more than he let on. I've worked on the assumption since, which helped me explain how willing he was to accept the bizarre and give free rein to Abbie and Ichabod. But more recently he's been portrayed as an…
Ouch. I hope this news doesn't derail the completion of the Jack & Jill trilogy.
I think they have done a poor job of developing her character.
Son? You mean more distant relative, . . right?
Jeremy is going to come to life. I don't think there is any doubt at all about that.
I agree with you that it was a weak episode (without agreeing with all your particular issues). I'm surprised by the positive reaction here. I came expecting to be defending the show while recognizing the weakness of this particular hour. This was possibly the worst episode of the series so far. But I'll take it…
I guess, as another commenter noted, it is probably best to not try to make sense of it.
That's pretty good observance for a 110 year old.
Not only that, but one thing that always bothered me about OUAT: Wouldn't Cinderella have been pregnant all those years? Didn't anyone think that was weird?
I'm not convinced of that.
Not trying to aggravate you. I just think this discussion went totally sideways. I don't know why we are arguing over third-world news of Paul Walker's death. The only reason the discussion went there was a response to the implication that people would react the same to celebrity death as to a non-celebrity death…
Paul Walker's death is getting some print in certain countries in Asia and the Near East. So what? I don't even know what you are trying to say at this point.
I doubt the news of Paul Walker's death is making much of a ripple in the non-internet active portion of the third world, so I don't really know what that distinction is suppose to mean in the context of this discussion. The idea that was floated is the phenomenon of large-scale public mourning of celebrity death is…
Yikes.
I guess it depends on what you mean. Most major newspapers, and many smaller ones, are online now. So that means more widely reported stories of deaths, including standard obits. If the idea here is the masses would react the same to a report of an "ordinary" person's death as they do to the report of a celebrity…