Please explain to us how more engine torque equates to greater accelerative performance.
Please explain to us how more engine torque equates to greater accelerative performance.
Hopefully the engines she’s sitting atop of (with her feet and half bare legs basically touching them) don’t get as hot as one would imagine.
A legitimate Typhoon would also include suspension mods for improved handling.
Fourth generation F bodies (Camaro and Firebird, most notably the 1LE versions ran with these anywhere. Even the various BMW enthusiast sites were commenting on that at the time.
The ZF 8 speed is an outstanding automatic.
A Lexus F series won’t be in this car’s league in terms of overall handling traits.
It’s already accepted fact that this engine will have a very broad and flat torque curve, which by definition equates to a wide horsepower band. The car also features a “sport” mode which alters transmission shifting parameters among other things.
So what’s the verdict?
Because the M3/M4 cars are heavier and substantially more expensive vehicles.
Yes, it does. This car is essentially a BMW Z4 with Toyota specific bodywork, a detuned engine and a few unique suspension components and structural reinforcements.
It doesn’t and the proper word in your sentence is “worse” (vs. “worst”).
Yep, Fiat-Chrysler’s quality and reliability suck. They’ve routinely ranked at or near of the bottom of CONSUMER REPORTS related list for years, meaning many more “eggs” than yours are bad.
Apparently you’re unacquainted with these results.
The Challenger does not handle “just fine” by even base level Camaro SS standards. 1LE Camaros and Shelby GT350 Mustangs are in a completely different league than any production model Challenger.
The more performance oriented Camaros (e.g., 1LE) and Mustangs (e.g., GT350) are in a different league than any Challenger in terms of overall handling traits. They’re also substantially lighter and more appropriately sized for their intended market segment.
The better Camaro (e.g, 1LE) and Mustang (e.g, Shelby GT) are in a different league than any production Challenger in terms of overall handling traits while also being substantially lighter.
I remember when people were insisting that 180 HP was the limit on front drive cars...
That’s a ridiculous comparison because the R simply isn’t a whole lot quicker around any road course than the GTI.
Fully concur and have purchased GTIs over Rs accordingly.
The R models are roughly 200 pounds heavier than similarly equipped GTIs and don’t included VW’s outstanding VAQ front differential.