lpmiller
lpmiller
lpmiller

I bet Edger would have done better job.

This is a bad take. This is the modern version of puritanical notions of bars and drinking. Since people who do ‘bad’ things are often drunk, we should ban drinking. Didn’t work 100 years ago and won’t work now. Reddit is awesome, particularly for any hobbies one might have. There are assholes in certain places but

Maybe it’s Mother Box. Maybe it’s Maybelline.

It used to be that mediocre white guys could be mediocre and still do alright.

What will the take be when Janet shows up as a special guest. Truly assume that’s happening.

Quite honestly? I have long since decided that if I enjoy a show, I stop caring about how it fits with any previous canon and timelines. In fact, I have even come to view discussions on such subjects as shows on their own right. If this thread expands to a full-on discussion, I might as well bring the popcorn.

Tell that to Gene Roddenberry, the creator of the franchise and executive producer who oversaw the complete redesign of the universe for Star Trek: The Motion Picture.

You’ve heard of ‘Broken Window Theory’? Now, Rick and Co. just have to wait for the neighborhood to go to shit.

I’m really hoping Jane remains Thor (and, you know, alive). Odinson could always be Star Thor. Jane as Thor, Odinson as a space-traveling Star Thor, and Volstagg as War Thor. And then eventually Volstagg can regenerate into The Docthor.

So now that we got Harvey Weinstein, I think Bryan Singer should be next.

Karl Urban champions a female Thor

Ok maybe been hanging out with too many then, you’re in digital media it’s understandable. Come back to Gen X...maybe pop in a few yo MTV raps episodes, and it will bring you back!

Except pretending like 23rd Century Earth technology will look like 1966 Star Trek is ridiculous and expecting shows to follow that aesthetic is also ridiculous. Gene Roddenberry’s original explanation was always better: “They’ve always had ridges.” I don’t like how extreme they’ve gone with Klingons, though.

Hey, the moment you commit to giant robots as a solution for anything (they are in fact not a viable solution for anything at all), it’s in for a penny in for a pound.

The answer to all those questions: “WHO CARES? GIANT ROBOTS!”

IMO Star Trek should always be forward looking

In Trek canon, the TOS (and TOS-movie) era saw experiments with transwarp technology, Omega molecules, and the Genesis device. The bio-drive thing doesn’t seem out of place.

According to the animated series, the iriginal Enterprise had a holodeck.

Because if you set the show 200 years in the future and gave everyone computers that were just boxes of flashing lights and futuristic “communicators” that were less advanced than modern smart phones, it would look silly. While the original series was very optimistic about technology (not to mention very cavalier

Hey now... that was uncalled for!