Why should we be forward deployed to a nation that spends LESS on GDP than we do? Shouldn’t South Korea, whose population is probably at the greatest risk of any nation on earth, at least equal the GDP share that we are spending to guard their asses?

I’m not advocating for Trump one bit here, but with the exception of the NATO piece, isn’t everyone of these colossal goat ropes you described already a colossal goat rope?

Sounds like you are trashing service members for their decisions, and their recruiters (who I have a feeling you’ve never spoken with), and then whining those same people need better VA services.

Not that capacity, weapons capacity and lethality. A single modern destroyer is more formidable and lethal than the entire destroyer fleet combined in WWII ( serious there, tomahawk TLAMS, standard missiles, aegis systems, etc.)

You must have accidentally taken a double dose of your medical marijuana.

Jesus.....we want good gear and support THERE, not shrinks that look like Lenin when we get back.

Hillary, is that you?

Guess what? We all want better gear and support when we are in the shit. Not getting shot in the ass is far more important than talking to a shrink AFTER you get shot in the ass.

While Russia looks upon Europe like a cat staring at the goldfish.

The fastest way to disable the Russian fleet is to sink their tugboats following their every move.

How presidential

http://www.bostondynamics.com/robot_ls3.html

That’s canadian $

Just a matter of time until he is picking pieces of his tailgate and a semi grill out of his ass.

Dude you can’t be serious.

Camo on his tail lights demonstrates his brilliance.

It appears to me we are reapproaching the ultimate zenith of military utilitarian transportation design.

Including the ships.

Of course, we could buy the same number, get the same price per round, then we have plenty of spares to blast the shit out of many places!

I’m not sure whose Navy you served in, or what you did there, but in the US Navy;