LOVE the /pol red herring. This screams /b
Is Far Cry 5 a good game?
Oh man, can you even IMAGINE thinking the scientific method was based around opinion?
Again, you are wrong in believing that facts are established with challenging opinions. They are challenged with research and other facts. I would happily watch a livestream of you reading op-eds just for the emotional vertigo.
Yeah, my man, you don’t really “get” what a fact is, do you? Cause it isn’t “The Thing In Between Two Opinions”.
Okay, but listen, like I said before: If Elon didn’t leak that info, how could he possibly try to preempt any and all criticism of his precious brand to ensure that Tesla’s Q1 numbers didn’t cause an investor panic? Huh? HOW COULD HE? HUH! I mean who cares about, like, respect and privacy and any piddly shit like…
I LOVE when Kotaku uses pull quotes five paragraphs before they appear in the story. Doesn’t look hackneyed at all, nope, so sir.
Oh, so it’s kind of like a ratio of sorts. A ratio of, like, things that are being compressed in a cylinder, if there was a term for that.
The Pope immediately loses me with his full-throated, iconically Catholic defense of the unborn, sure, but that second part feels good.
Here for salt. How’d y’all find all of it?
I like that desk. Lots of work space.
That moment when you realize every previous Camaro has been ugly as sunbaked dog splatters.
I honestly didn’t know Chevy still had a design department.
Yeah...this is not what that data indicates.
Stay mad! <3
then what happened
Son, YOU brought Hillary into this, claiming you KNEW she would do worse. And now you’ve admitted you don’t know that at all. You may go now.
Oh, they did sell their integrity. The sold it out of cowardice. I’ve already lost jobs for my political opinions, and I did it proudly. They deserve this, because they’re complicit.
Oh, why would you still be talking about the election? We’re talking about trade wars here, my son, that’s happening right now. So then, presumably, you’re talking about Hillary Clinton, and are unable to say her name like you’re fucking Professor Quirrell. That means the original point you were trying to make was…
First, you would need to name whoever it is you’re talking about, state what relevance they have to the current situation. and then prove that they know less about business then Donald “Trade Wars Are Easy To Win” Trump. My point is already proven. Yours isn’t even formulated.