lorq
lorq
lorq

"...that I don't like." There, fixed that for you.

Nice try, but it was the financial crisis which causes those systems to crash. You know — unregulated capitalism. But go ahead — keep blaming the victim.

You're either playing dumb or you are dumb. Either way it's a concession.

Interesting to hear that, as I was recently wondering just the same thing. I mean, if all these businesses are so eager to pass on certain responsibilities for insurance to the government...

Send a flotilla to Titan!

I agree re: Demolished Man. The Stars My Destination gets most of the press, but I've always felt it was kind of too sprawling for its own good. Demolished Man is very tight and emotionally intense.

Thank goodness people like you are around to lecture people at verbose length on why they're saying more than they should.

Well, from the poly relationships I've observed, raising kids becomes significantly easier, as there are more caretakers around to perform parenting duties at any given moment.

I deal by not watching movies that are likely to induce it.

Why should you be "concerned" one way or the other? Are you on Disney's payroll?

Your attempt to change the subject is duly noted.

The sockpuppets are strong with this thread.

Actually the argument btwn. Raccoon & Lord is completely witless.
And everything else looks like stuff I've seen before a thousand times.
I'm calling Emperor's New Clothes on this one.
Looks dull.

Having read the whole article, I feel that what it reads like is a really poor attempt to do philosophy of science. The article quotes Kuhn, Popper, and Quine — big names in that field of thought — but essentially every point it makes is either a weird non sequitur or a misapplication of the ideas of those thinkers.

Engineer does not actually look terribly happy at the end. And the way it's cut, while he's probably just climbing out of the raft, it looks like he's vomiting over the side.

And you just want to see young lady boob, but you won't admit it to yourself!
(Come on — *obviously* this film is at least in part about voyeurism. What do you make of the ramshackle/skanky backdrop, exactly? What do you think of the "doctor"?)

Fanboy! Sock puppet! Cash grab! *Someone* is a passionate little fanboy here.

I think your rebuttal is too strong. Surely the film is taking some advantage of the "thrill" factor of seeing naked breasts. Same way it's taking advantage of the fact that the woman is young and attractive, as opposed to, say, elderly and plain. (I would very much like to see a version of this with an elderly and

I'm going to agree with some other commenters here that the first half was definitely stronger than the second. Watching the second half I got a *strong* feeling that the money ran out. It's almost like they literally couldn't afford a DP anymore — like they were just pointing and shooting the camera.
However, I

Holy hell, these are *sweet*.
Another great gallery from V.M.