lorq
lorq
lorq

Perhaps the notion should be to reward the concrete plan for action that follows *from* the failure.

Gotta love the note-perfect Ultraman look.

I think King's assessment of both himself and Kubrick is very astute. King is fundamentally a sentimental writer — and I mean that in the best possible way. He does want to reach out to the reader, to speak to the reader's own generosity and humanism. Kubrick is the antithesis of sentimental — not only is he cool

"Sitting on a train, sipping wine is not what we are about."
You don't own the definition of all American commuters and you don't speak for me.

Bitch please, get a thicker skin.

Source for that 99.9% statistic on Christians who don't believe in a 6,000 year old earth?

Ah, but their very lack of sympathy is also a function of the situation.

I once dated a woman whose role model was Maleficent.

As a male supporter of feminism, I think something that will make one a more *effective* supporter — not to mention signal a sincere, proactive engagement with the issues — is to know something about the history of feminism. Who are the major feminist thinkers? What are the major feminist texts? Have your read

I think you're confusing action-oriented self-assessment with paralyzing self-judgment. The central point of the article that there's a version of being an "optimist" or a "positive thinker" that's based on an irresponsible refusal to assess one's own behavior realistically, and thus to change it. The article is

So long, Gerry Anderson — you helped fill my kidhood years with science-fictional fun and visual excitement.

I'd still like to see the storyboards Ridley Scott drew for "Alien" published in their entirety. He was a really gifted artist.

Thanks a lot for that link. That is one well-written article.

I don't know what the rest of "Holy Terror" is like, but I'm struck by how the first panel (and to a lesser degree, the second) is swamped by its own word balloons. Miller doesn't want to draw, he wants to monologue.

Especially since Kitsune's question was rhetorical. But you used it as an occasion to keep on talking.

Utterly baffled by the mixed critical response this film has been getting. It moves along quite briskly (I see no problem with infodumps; at the very least nothing to distinguish it from LOTR), the performances are very good, it's tonally consistent with the source material, it's visually phenomenal, it's *way* less

I am truly, honestly baffled by the mixed critical response to this film. Now, I saw it in 3D, but did *not* see it in 48 fps, which, had I seen it that way, might well have distanced me from the action in just the way the reviewer describes. So I suspect I got the best of all worlds.

So, "Neon Genesis Evangelion" with a title change.

Sounds like a very worthy project. Do you know EcoVillage Ithaca? It's the one cohousing village I've actually visited. Fancier, possibly, than what you're describing, but still very inspiring.