This doesn’t really do any good unless you purchased the game direct from Ubisoft. The retailer you bought the game from has already paid Ubisoft, the sale has already been counted for their sales figures, and Ubisoft already has their money.
The only thing disputing the charge will do is piss off the retailer, who…

Ouch

Why? I'll bet the EULA that you have to agree to states they can take away your access at any time they chose to. I'll even bet it states they can do so with no reason provided. Good luck with a court case on that one, snowballs in hell have a better chance.

Ohh burn! Ouch.

So what is normal anyway?
Does society decide what is normal? Do you? Who’s to say what the overriding authority on normal is?
Time’s change. Social norms change. You can either keep up or join the dinosaurs.

I wonder, when FF VII remix or whatever comes out, will it have Aerith as DLC.
Play with her again, even though she died, for only $5.99.
I remember all the strange tricks and wild ass theories that abounded back then with people trying to find some way to bring her back to life. Turns out, they just had to wait for…

Sounds more like trying to justify internally the amount of effort and time they have devoted to their chosen hobby. Be it gaming or watching sports.
You see the same behavior in the console debates. People can only afford one, so they defend it viciously: so they can justify to themselves that they made the right…

You too could pay $1.50 for your own flashing neon sombrero.
Or you could hook for it.

Dude, angry much? Making video games is a business. If making games for “casuals” or games that appeal to “casuals” makes them more money than doing it for the art, you can damn well bet they will make games for “casuals.”
So, whine if it makes you feel better, but understand that you will forever be in the minority…

Wow, that is an assload of money to be turning your nose up at. Filthy "casuals" or not, that is a lot of damn money. If it makes them that much it would be criminally stupid to turn it down.

Wrong spot to reply, stupid kinja won't let me cancel or delete this.

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016­…-

Would you risk your life to protect them?

I’m sorry, are you a cop? Have you been through the training?

And you are a moron. Please list the 1001 different ways this could be prevented based on the facts presented in this article.

There are other ways to stop them, but in confined quarters, using a gun, there are no wounding shots, every bullet is meant to kill. There are no halvsies on this. It’s not like the movies where you can just shoot them in the leg or arm to take a person out without killing them. It’s center-mass and keep firing until…

Yea, it is.

How are the cops supposed to tell the difference between autism, being high, and being violent? Are there any visual cues? Do autistic people wear signs? Really, how are they supposed to know?

TIE Defenders FTW!!! If the Imps had more of these and less of the flying coffins the were regular TIEs, the rebels never would have stood a chance. Too bad they cost 5x as much as a regular TIE. Bet the development story would be pretty close to the F-35 fiasco.

Or could it be that it was 1977? It wasn’t until 1977 that a standardized system for e-mail was written. The first email was sent in 1969, but that was on friggin ARPA Net. The concept of email was just barely out of it’s infancy and probably wasn’t well known yet.