lorddisco
Jason C.
lorddisco

So you make this shitty comparison to make a point, but now it's my fault that you made this shitty comparison? And I'm grasping for straws? Yeeeaaaaah, right.

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You said it yourself through your ridiculous movie theater and popcorn comparison. The "popcorn" (AKA GTA Online's Heists) sucks, although the "movie" (AKA GTAV and GTA Online) was "great".

*sigh* Where did Rockstar ever promise to release this feature at a certain time? Did they ever say it was supposed to be on the disc? Did they promise you would enjoy online heists immediately upon your purchase of GTAV? The answers are no, no, and no. You're criticizing a feature that you haven't even played, that

Card pulled, because you are trying to both devalue a whole product AND complain about a free online addition that you have yet to play (And apparently think "sucks").

Two separate things? Separate? Are you fucking serious? GTAV is ONE package....

Holy shit. Are you serious? That's the stupidest comparison I have ever heard in regards to free DLC.

Yes they do. Are you daft? A package is a package, and GTAV is a huge package. You MUST include the single player with the whole package, because it IS part of the package. You can't buffet GTAV and complain about one small thing that disappointed you and make it sound like Rockstar fucked up. They didn't. The game IS

Simply because you tried to exclude the single player content of a game that is primarily a single player game. GTAV's number 1 point is its single player campaign and story, just like GTAIV before it. Trying to take that out of the equation is why your response was idiotic. Thinking that the value of GTAV is in its

There is no reason to respond with anything intelligent, because your response was anything but.

What the fuck are you even talking about? It IS free. You buy the game, and it's a huge package. 80+ hours worth of story content, endless hours of online content, and tons of stuff to do between both off and online scenarios. Rockstar is known for being an anal company in regards to making their games work, so the

Yes, it's done right. They waited until it was ready, AND they didn't charge for it. It's a free (Repeat: FREE) update. RockStar isn't nickel and diming with stupid DLC in GTAV. They've been adding in content ever since the game came out for free with each update, and that is awesome. It's kept the online community

Which still use cash to fill up. It's not credit or debit at all. Cash.

I can see that. I'm not a huge fan of sauce on my burgers, so I usually ask for it without sauce. I guess I'm comparing the actual burgers and their taste. In that, Freshness is better than Mos to me.

For future reference, rarely do restaurants in Japan take credit cards. Actually, most places in Japan don't take credit cards. It's mostly limited to certain electronic stores, some clothing stores, most furniture stores, and then just random places. Japan uses cash, period. It's just the way the country is. In the

Hmm... I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you on Mos Burger being the best fast food burger in Japan. I personally think Freshness Burger is much better, both in quality and in taste.

Look on every Nintendo controller and tell me otherwise. Microsoft didn't invent the ABXY method, and on every Nintendo controller, A is forward and B is back. A is on the right and B is bottom left.

Oh, maybe that is the case. haha. I live in Japan, and it's infuriating playing North American games on my PS3 or PS4 or Vita and having X and O switched on me. Maybe because Sony and Nintendo both do right button for forward is why I'm so used to it.

BUTTON REMAPPING?!! I can finally make all games switch the X and O?! Sorry, North Americans, but X means back. O means forward. On every other major controller outside of Playstation, B is always back and A is always forward, and that mapping matches like this on a Playstation controller: B = X and O = A. Why did

This is... all right, I guess. Sadly, though, she doesn't look real at all. It looks like a buff dude with a woman's face. Why can't we just have real-looking woman? A fair share of skinny, medium sized, heavy, big breasted, no-breasted, long legs, short legs, a model's face, or even a boot-nasty face. Variety makes

Exactly! That's what I'm hoping for. Since like we've established, they already did a fine job of creating an interesting world with great characters, next time they can flesh out the gameplay and make it work more fluidly, or at least be more unique.