Players absolutely should be forced to talk to journalists who are "biased against them". Journalism is publishing something that someone doesn't want to be published, all else is public relations, which means anyone who's actually doing journalism is inevitably going to come across as "biased" to subjects in the…

Clickbait. Not a home run.

Heroine: my anti-drug.

The fundamental point of sports is not entertainment, but tribalism, in a very negative sense - it’s not only okay but applauded to be constantly angry as a sports fan, and teams that are dinged for being “not entertaining” are really sinning by failing to provide a sufficient tribal identity. Cleveland Browns >…

But somehow hijabs are a threat to civilization ...

Why didn’t you just buy a box? Then you could have photographed it to your heart’s content.

She sounds sounds like an anti-vaxxer because she cited, offhand, a stat that used to be true back when the debate was not a foregone conclusion and which she hasn’t kept updated mentally because it doesn’t even matter to her argument? I hope you carefully keep updated the vital statistics on every political subject…

Yeah, but advertisers won't bother to spend to catch the eyeballs of people who are watching tv because they have so little discretionary money available in their budget they can't afford to do anything that costs money. The size of the audience doesn't matter, the size of its collective wallet does.

No one under 35 watches baseball because baseball in its entirety sucks - groundballs no less so than any other aspect of the game. Watching a ball dribble along the ground might be entertaining to you if you are a dog, as anyone posting from an anonymous internet account might well be, but for humans? Not so much.

If you want to watch a game decided by randomness rather than merit why not watch plinko? Not much different than watching the random bouncing of a groundball and pretending to yourself its ultimate disposition is an earned result.

“I’m all for certain regulations, David ...”

320 million is grossly inadequate, given that many or most of those firearms will have changed hands repeatedly in two decades. Should be 600 million or 900 million background checks, easily. 

Donald Trump has money: reason to vote for him

Trump couldn’t even crack 50% in north carolina against one of the weakest major-party candidates in history but he has nothing to worry about there in 2020?

Shut up, tomato.

Bad news, mcdonalds is replacing workers with automation.

It's been revoked.

And no 737 max had gone down in any of its thousands of flights before the lionair crash, so I guess they were good to go, right? Or maybe you do safety proactively ...

Wait, he’s loving his helmet? What, through the earhole? That explains some things ...

This is standard procedure for vulture capitalists, buy a property that's in the red, strip it of assets, declare bankruptcy and dump the carcass.