Too much to expect logic from these guys, I know.

But the "why don't you want to 'get to know me'/'you're judging me way too early based only on my initial sexual harassment' crap is gut-churningly at odds with "I am entitled to make a snap-judgement based entirely on the fact that 'you are 6'"

Superficiality is only…

"This project was in no way meant for commercial purposes" but he's still building a career based on impressing people in the fashion world? And thinks THIS is the way to do it? I wonder how he got the designer clothes for the shoot, if not loaned by some designer who thought this was an OK idea.

Yup. And here. http://retheauditors.com/2014/04/03/ben… Thing is, his wikipedia page doesn't have any of this. It's entirely self-promotional. Now, where could we find a feminist cyber-army to put that right?