Generally speaking: A manual window is a simple design with a crank and a “regulator” consisting of a simple gear ran by said crank, like this:

Come to the Rust belt.

any and all K cars from Chrysler.

Plenty.

Sorry for the crappy drawing, but you get the idea. Looks an awful lot like these to me:

You can get a good used booster for $100 on Ebay for the BMW, or you can buy a brand new one for the Nissan for $100 on RA. Repairing a car with used parts is just asking for failure IMO.

Yet this Nissan will run longer and be cheaper to maintain.

Aftermarket tails still have the wrong design. The Tundra has elongated tails, like the one in the pic, the Dodge does not.

Possibly, but IMO, that defeats the purpose of buying a brand new vehicle.

Tailights are wrong.

I prefer to look at a map, then drive.

It’s all the same mechanical parts, without the addition of an electric motor and regulator (which are the parts that always fail).

Spent quite a bit of seat time in both cars.

I learn my commute.

You haven’t driven to work enough times to know what ways gridlock and what ways don’t?

You really need navigation to get to work everyday.......

Less electronics to fail = A more reliable design.

Almost like some people need a better sense of direction. If you honestly need your phone to get to work everyday (aka the same place you go daily), you have bigger issues.

Ha, funny. Never had one fail in a Mopar product.

You use your phone while driving. Read it perfectly, now put it down and get back to driving.