Where’s the fun in having a computer modulate your traction for you?

Why swap drivetrains when the original is capable of a lot of power?

I drove all of them last year when we were thinking about buying a new van.

Possibly. It’s their 3rd Honda Odyssey to my knowledge. I believe the 1st one was a 98 which they scrapped when it hatched the motor under 100k. The 2nd was a 2004 which they traded on the 2014 after replacing it’s 2nd transmission and the engine beginning to eat oil. Honestly, they’ve had more issues with their Honda…

Captains chairs defeat the usefulness of the minivan IMO.

Our neighbor’s Honda is on it’s 3rd transmission since they bought it. It’s a 2014.

3rd Sienna since 2010?

That’s a debate I’ll leave alone for today.

Far too rolly/numb for my tastes. The Odyssey is the same way.

Probably bc the word “minivan” is a synonym for compromise in *wannbe speak. Make no mistake, while you think that’s cool, *I’m too ignorant to comprehend it. And that’s allright. Enjoy your minivan. Also 14.6 1/4 mile is fun? What year is it, 1998?

IMO, the XJ was a CUV. Just because it was a CUV doesn’t discount it’s abilities.

14.6s quarter miles, running with “fun” cars on the track, hauling the family with ease.

The van I pictured was used for Autox regularly. It would hold it’s own on the track, be it corners or straight-line.

We already have enough CUVs plaguing our roads thanks.

Buy the minivan, but not the Sienna.

Because *modern minivans are huge?

Sure, a minivan can’t be hustled at illegal speeds around corners, and it’s huge, but it’s practical.

Just buy the damn minivan................In lightweight, turbo form:

Kids these days

Someone doesn’t remember the Celica was RWD in it’s better days.......