The pics of "19th and Valencia (Mission District)" and "18th and Valencia (Mission District)" are of the very same location.

It's also strange that the "Esso", "On The Run", and "Tiger Wash" signs have been removed, since ExxonMobil owns those brands as well as owning the Mobil 1 brand.

The even lesser-known Wings & Water Wednesday was a great change of pace, as well.

Yeah, it's definitely not a certainty, and they've abandoned the concept somewhat, but check out Ford's North American M.Y. 2007 lineup:

I have noticed. Also, many of their other vehicles begin with "F". Fiesta, Festiva, Focus, Fusion, Five Hundred, Freestar, Freestyle, Falcon, Fairlane, Fairmont, and of course F-Series. The E & F phase was at its highest in the '00s.

I guess the term "SUV" also varies depending on where you're from.

As others have said, many 4x4s have open (not locked) differentials in their axles. It's the front-to rear distribution of power that differs between the two.

I agree with you that American trucks have been getting ridiculously large, especially in the "face".

Yep, same number, CES 1404:

Good point, though it should be the other way around. The E-Class nomenclature dates back to the 1994 model year, but Ford didn't begin using the E-Series name until M.Y. 2001.

The name dates back to '61, and they touted how economical these new commercial vehicles were to own & operate.

The two photos are of the same generation from model years 1992-2014. The second one is of a facelifted 2008+ model. It uses the same headlights and a similar grille as the Ford Super Duty F-Series (F-250 and larger) that was also facelifted the same year.

The full-size North American Ford van was originally called "Econoline", and was renamed E-Series with models "E150", E250", E350" & "E-450", just like the F-Series truck. I'm not a trademark lawyer, but the name "Model E" is likely too similar.

Need For Speed: World is free-to-play. How can it be 70% off?

Don't you mean Pay 'n' Spray, since that's the customizing shop in most GTAs?

Really, though, nobody can or should stop him from flying his flags. He just has to pay for repairs out of his own pocket.

I guess that not only did you not read the article, but you also lack common sense.

Half of this guy's ideas (the other half are actually brilliant):

This perhaps is the first thread I've seen with any commenters accepting and even defending vertical videos.

[citation needed]