lolololololol11
lolololololol11
lolololololol11

oh good thing doestic violence is ok as long as it is on someone larger than you!

what's it like being a fat cunt??

Yeah, because that makes sense

This article conveniently leaves out most of the important facts in the case and predictably uses it to promote its feminist ideology. It fails to mention that the alleged incident was reported by a third party and the alleged victim has refused to cooperate with the police. No one has been charged. Nevertheless,

Finally! Some negative coverage of the UFC by Deadspin!

Now playing

Klinsman sells it like the Rock sells a Stone Cold Stunner

and since the previous WC party bombing was almost 2 weeks ago, enough time had passed?

B-b-but it was an accident! They definitely didn't mention the attacks at any point during the WC coverage that he was watching!

Deadspin should write an article on how a Deadspin writer wrote an ignorant headline.

I'd call you retarded for not realizing how shitty this headline is given the international context, but then I realized: This is Gawker. You get paid by the click on your shitty stories. Writing a disgusting title like that draws in people to call you a shitheel, and you profit from it.

Stupid headline. You're gross.

Considering what's going on in Nigeria right now, this headline is just awful.

Right. Because only women are victims of domestic violence. Nice sexism, ad.

The thing with England is that their players are always overrated by the English press. Look over their squad. None of the guys are even the best player on their own team. Like for example, Man City was the best team in England last year and besides Joe Hart, there isn't one English player in their starting lineup.

It is BEYOND OBVIOUS what this person means by "Hate Speech" is nothing more than speech SHE HATES. This person Kat is just too frail & emotional for the real world civil rights.

you are not doing us a favor.

This crime is tragic, and the police officer's response is certainly not the best. I know some other people have made similar posts, but I wanted to post how I read his quote:

They need evidence that is a hate-crime before they can investigate it as such. It is very likely that this was a hate-crime and they know that, but if they make that presumption now they could potentially overlook evidence pointing them in another direction. It could taint the investigation. All they know is that

No, he's not blind. Neither you nor he have any idea whether or not this was a hate crime. Just because she is a transgendered minority doesn't mean that was the cause if her death. Maybe she had an angry ex, maybe she witnessed something she shouldn't have, maybe some crazy person jacked up on bath salts and PCP

It propobly has a lot to do with having lived through the 90's in an eastern block state, but burning a body and dumping it in a trash can does not imidiatly jump at me as something hate crime related. We had people who were tied up on top of anthills with their guts cut open left to die over silly feuds.