Sure, the law is applicable to both the rich and poor in the same way that laws banning sleeping under bridges or begging in the street is also applicable to both rich and poor.

Wow, well if ProfitableVenture.com says it, it must be true! And must definitely be true for all gas stations regardless of location - it’s not like the value of property varies based on where it’s located. You really analyzed this well, super smart, A+.

Naw, it’s rich people’s math. She leveraged a million dollars. Poor people don’t have a million dollars.

Bootlickers in the comments be like

Naw, it’s rich people’s math. She leveraged a million dollars. Poor people don’t have a million dollars.

Yes, what will the world do without an experts input on Amouranth’s fucking gas station.

This will always remind me about ‘Boots’ Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness. Where the rich person can afford a good pair of boots ($50) that will last for many years whereas the person can only afford to buy an okay pair of boots that still gets wet ($10) and last maybe a season or two.

And also not a comp structurally. You’re comparing the aggregate construction cost of a government funded/operated facility versus the perceived net present value of cash flows tied to a private business. It’s completely irrelevant.

That is... in no way a comp for a gas station.

This is just a guess, but based on Shailene’s woo woo alternative medicine ways, I would guess she’s anti-vaccine.

I have someone who for years insists Aaron Rodgers is downlow and all these women are his beards. I always laughed it off but this insta is kinda making me reconsider my position.

Yet one more reason why I cannot stand Shalene Woodley. Ugh.

My employer did this when they ordered a return to office work and saw employee turnover skyrocket. They gave all employees of our agency a 5% cost-of-living adjustment, which was really cool because it meant my salary went up by less than $2000 a year while our chief of staff’s salary went up over $20,000, basically…

Remember: This means the money was always there the entire time, they just only *now* felt the pressure to loosen the purse strings.

But they always could have. Any minute of any day of any year, they could have done this yet chose not to.  

Don’t be silly... the victims were forced out years ago and blackballed in much of the industry. 

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

If you give every employee a 5% raise, the ones who already earn more will get a bigger raise. So why would you go out of your way to make it a bigger percentage for the higher-paid? What kind of moon logic is this

Games pay SIGNIFICANTLY less for nearly all roles than you would make in a similar job outside of games. 

So all the people who turned a blind eye to years of sexism and sexual harassment get a big pay raise, and the victims get a tiny one. Yeah, that’ll help morale.

At this point the mismanagement at Ubisoft is just baffling. Like, you’re bleeding devs because people aren’t sure if they will get a competent boss or a guy being “protected” from HR complaints.