cats maul

TBF, “detective Batman” and “emo Batman” can be the same guy. those two things don’t necessarily contradict each other. now if you had already seen the movie, and there was no detective stuff whatsoever, then yeah it’d be a big misdirect. but until we’ve seen the movie and know the plot points, there’s no reason to…

there are cases where the marketing does not reflect the film particularly well. for example, the trailers and marketing made me believe that the Eternals would be much cheesier and worse than it actually ended up being. or on the DC side, the trailer and marketing for the 2016 Suicide Squad made me think it would be…

they should make Garfield’s Amazing Spider-Man movies canon with Venom and Morbius.

wait, the more i think about this...

HAHA! i do remember the Venom 2 scene mentioning “hive knowledge across universes”, but even after watching No Way Home, i didn’t connect that to the Spider-Man 3 symbiote until your comment just now. i’ll take it, but its being held together by the thinnest thread. 

hold your horses, you keep getting upset at some scenario that i’m not talking about.

credits scene 1 was dumb. the movie dictates that the spell was calling “everyone who knew Peter Parker was Spider-Man across the multiverse” so why are Venom and Eddie there, and why was their first question “who’s that guy?”

But what you’re proposing is that people who bought a game be barred from accessing some of the game’s content, whether that be a speed boost, a cool weapon, etc. You’re suggesting those things should be NFTs, exclusively held by the highest bidder.

remember when Brtiney was wearing a lot of fedoras? like part of that sexy business woman/gangster look? then later Justin Timberlake wore a lot of fedoras? it’s a shame they were never a fedora couple.   

write a book. 

maybe someone like Tom Hanks should just hold a seminar every year “How to be Incredibly Famous and Yet Seemingly Down to Earth”

while i don’t agree with the conservatorship, nor necessarily disagree with you, Britney Spears is incredibly famous (and influential to the masses). so the “lots of people” argument wouldn’t really support Britney’s case, as we would expect that she’s in a completely unique situation from most people. this could…

hey Jalopnik folks! i’m moreso from Kotaku/Gizmodo, but just wanted to ask, if driving is a sport, then esports is a sport too. right?

where do we draw the line between liking something because it was created to be “neat” versus disliking something because it was created “to make money”? aren’t all AAA games created to make money? should we only play indie games that are made out of passion?

being upfront, i never played WoW (or any MMO) myself, but have seen it a lot. but what i’m imaging is that there could be some future MMO game with a quest that takes a long time to complete. but completing that quest rewards you a very special item with a specific/unique powerset. and let’s say that this game also…

why do you keep bringing it back to money and paying for things? i’m just saying that NFT technology in general could potentially be adapted into something applicable for video games (at least moreso than other things, like an art gallery). nobody said you you have buy and sell in-game NFT (at an inflated price at…

that’s not what i’m talking about. my first point was that this would go beyond current implementation of NFT’s (art/skins). my point was that video games are space where digital credentials can have functional impacts to your experience.

the ultimate video game fantasy is a “real world” without consequences. okay, swap verbiage of “more like the real world” to “more immersive”.

i don’t think i need to know what a “Blizzard’s Diablo 3 Auction House” is to understand how NFT’s work.