Open carry is nothing more than a “shoot me first” sign. Concealed carry allows for the element of surprise while also not making a firearm available.

Many schools around the country already allow their teachers to be armed. The scary scenarios people predict don’t seem to happen.

Did you know that many states already have teachers that carry?

Did you know that many states already have teachers that carry?

I can see why it might be confusing if you don’t know much about it.

I don’t understand from you comments what you think the problem is.

Do you really believe that a psychologically damaged man dedicated to committing mass murder couldn’t have obtained a gun? Pfft.

Cruz already violated laws that should have prevented this tragedy.

Handguns are actually much easier to carry around and millions of people do it today.

The frustrating part of the new age ban is that frustrating is now adults 18-21 year old are unable to legally own one for self-defense.

Who? Cruz?

That isn’t what I was speaking about but I can answer your question.

Wow. You are so brave you have to delete a comment that you didn’t like.

Anyone who blames others for not being willing victims is just irresponsible.

Well, the “Gun Free” (aka Mass Murderer Protection) Zone did prevent Coach Feis (and potentially others) from shooting Cruz to stop the murders.

You have confused the words “reasonable” and gun legislation.

You are correct. Accuracy drops dramatically.

Why? Does damaging people’s hearing make you happy somehow?

Australian armed robberies actually INCREASED following their ballyhooed buy-back.

I’m sure the criminals would all comply and that law-abiding citizens would not become victims.